MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1967271951 · doi:10.2118/90265-ms

A New Coupled Fluid Flow/Stress Model for Porous Media Behavior: Numerical Modeling and Experimental Investigation

2004· article· en· W1967271951 sur OpenAlexaff
Hadi Belhaj, Robert J. Ryan, A. M. Nouri, Stephen Butt, Paul K. Frempong, Reajul Islam

Notice bibliographique

RevueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPermeability (electromagnetism)Porous mediumPorosityDarcy's lawFluid dynamicsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsPetroleum engineeringGeotechnical engineeringProcess (computing)Computer scienceGeologyPhysicsChemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Proposal Reservoir management has been improved dramatically through adaptation of new technologies, enhancement of uncertainty involved and better data management to meet the challenges of today's economic constraints. Yet, these remarkable achievements included little or none about questioning the fundamental concepts of reservoir behavior and the assumptions made at the early days. In this paper, a comprehensive experimental program has been carried out using a triaxial set-up equipped with on-line acoustic apparatus to study reservoir behavior under depletion process. Fluid flow and reservoir rock properties' behaviors have been investigated as the reservoir is being produced. It has been concluded that the currently used methodology is in great error. Using the diffusivity model based on Darcy's law is one source of this error and the assumption of constant porosity and permeability throughout the life of the reservoir is another source. Therefore, a new fluid model has been proposed to replace the Darcy's model. The new model is derived from the Navier-Stokes equation and is capable of addressing all kinds of fluid flow taking place in reservoirs at low and high flow velocities including both Darcian and non-Darcian regimes1. On the other hand a new model relates porosity to the mean effective stress changes during a depletion process has been mathematically derived, this model is able to track porosity changes as effective stresses increase during reservoir production. The idea is to couple this model with the fluid flow model introduced in this study so both porosity and permeability can be updated at each time step during simulation of reservoir behavior. Laboratory results confirm the numerical predictions of the proposed coupled fluid flow/stress model, at the same time the laboratory results are in complete disagreement with Darcy's model predictions. Improvement of reservoir simulators' accuracy is expected through the implementation of the newly proposed model. Introduction Traditionally, data about petrophysical properties are essential for reserves' estimates and for the fluid flow characterization of petroleum reservoirs. A great deal of money and effort are expended to determine these properties accurately. Permeability and porosity are among those properties and are by far the most important. Porosity is the key for reserves' estimates while permeability is the main parameter to predict flow rates, design drawdown and therefore wellbore completion. Until recently, the common belief was that, once determined, these properties remain constant throughout the production life of the reservoir. However, numerous research studies2–14 including this one, show that this is not the case. During the pressure depletion process as production from the reservoir continues, effective stresses within the reservoir increase. The effect of reservoir stresses on porosity and permeability of the reservoir is more severe when porosity and permeability are high (fractured media is an extreme case), although some experimental studies like Hubbert and Willis3, Voight4 and Rosepiler5, showed that this effect is still significant even at low porosity and permeability. When considering percentage losses from the original state of the reservoir, it seems that the same percentage of porosity and permeability reductions was experienced regardless of the original values. It is also understood that stress paths have a large influence on horizontal and vertical permeability as well as on porosity. The elastic uniaxial strain model is used in reservoir engineering mostly to describe production-induced changes in horizontal stress due to pore pressure decline (pressure depletion). It predicts the total horizontal stress by using overburden stress, reservoir pressure decrease and material mechanical parameters. The principal assumption in this model is that there is no lateral deformation (zero horizontal strain condition) during the depletion process.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: Méthodes
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionMême sujetHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisTravaux en français237 207