Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gouldian Finches are beautiful colourful birds and, although commonly described as a monogamous species, female Gouldian Finches are anything but faithful. As Sarah Pryke and her colleagues at Macquarie University in Australia observed, female Gouldian finches will cheat on their mate at the slightest opportunity. Why would they do that? It's easy to explain why males cheat; increased progeny leads to increased fitness. However, breeding is more costly for females and an understanding of the benefits of promiscuity is more elusive. A recent paper in Science by Pryke and her colleagues proposes that infidelity, together with post-copulatory sperm selection, aids a female in choosing the best candidate as the father of her chicks.Of the three morphs of Gouldian finches – red heads, black heads and yellow heads – the red and black head morphs are genetically incompatible, and – as Pryke and Simon Griffith noted in 2009 – interbreeding between the two morphs results in a 60% increase in offspring mortality. However, compatible males are not always around, and as some red head males are heterozygous and carry the black head allele, it's not always that easy for a female Gouldian finch to tell which prospective partner is the most compatible choice. Pryke and her colleagues performed a series of experiments to determine how often female Gouldian Finches engage in cheating, whether the propensity to cheat depends on the female's compatibility with her partner and the interloper, and whether post-copulatory mechanisms play a role in selecting the most compatible father for a female's offspring.The researchers used 40 Gouldian finch females bonded to either a compatible or an incompatible male. During the experiments the females were visually separated from their social mate by an opaque plastic divider that split the cage in two. Pryke and her colleagues then presented the female with a compatible or an incompatible male, giving her the opportunity to copulate with the new male. The visiting males performed courtship displays in 95% of the cases and the females were quite promiscuous in response; 77.5% of the females solicited and copulated with the new males, irrespective of their compatibility status with their mate or the interloping male. However, fertilization of the eggs was not so indiscriminate; all of the offspring were fathered by her long-term mate when he was compatible and the interloping male was incompatible, but compatible interlopers fathered more offspring when the long-term mate was incompatible. This happened despite the fact that females had only one chance to indulge in an extramarital affair, but multiple opportunities to copulate with their long-term partner.For a long time, the adaptive reason for female promiscuity has been a mystery. This new study provides insight into the evolution of female infidelity in birds. When compatible males are unavailable, or when unable to determine whether their life partner is genetically compatible or not, Gouldian finch females are faced with a conundrum. And how do they circumvent these problems? Well...they cheat... and then, they select the most compatible sperm and fertilize their eggs with it to give their chicks the best father they can get.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».