Simulation of Trapping Processes for CO2 Storage in Saline Aquifers
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Important modelling techniques for CO2 storage in saline aquifers are discussed, in particular solubility trapping, residual gas trapping and geochemistry for mineral trapping. These modelling techniques are applied to the simulation of several important aspects of CO2 storage, which include optimizing total trapping through water injection, assessing the security of residual trapping with regards to leakage through the cap rocks and evaluating the conversion of CO2 into minerals. Introduction Saline aquifers represent the most important venue for CO2 storage since they have the largest capacity among all other venues (coal seams, depleted gas and oil fields). Table 1 (DOE and NETL, Carbon and Sequestration Atlas for the United States and Canada, 2008) shows the dominance of saline aquifers for large scale deployment of CO2 storage. There are several CO2 trapping mechanisms in saline aquifers:structural trapping;residual gas trapping;solubility trapping andmineral trapping. Structural trapping involves the storage of CO2 in a geological structure as a free gas or super-critical fluid. CO2 can flow and escape through the cap rock or sealing faults if the integrity of the latter is compromised. Residual gas trapping consists of storing CO2 as an immobile gas in the porous media. This process has been identified as one of the most important processes for safe CO2 storage as the immobile gas can be kept away from the cap rock. CO2 is highly soluble in brine and solubility trapping is essentially the impetus for CO2 storage in saline aquifers. As CO2 dissolves in brine, it decomposes into H+ and HCO−3. These ions in turn react with the minerals in place. Depending on the mineralogy of the formation, these reactions could induce precipitation of carbonate minerals such as Calcite, Dolomite and Siderite, which corresponds essentially to the conversion of CO2 into minerals. This paper discusses the modelling of the physics associated with CO2 storage in saline aquifers and illustrates through examples the important storage processes. Table 1: Storage Capacity for CO2 Storage in North America (Available in full paper) CO2 has a critical pressure of 7,376 kPa and a critical temperature of 304.2 K (31 °C). Thus, CO2 is normally a supercritical fluid at aquifer conditions. For convenience, CO2 is referred to as a "gas" in this paper. To be general, the gas phase is treated as a multicomponent mixture. The simulation and modelling techniques described in this paper are based on the geochemical equation-of-state compositional simulator, GEM ™ with the greenhouse gas option (Nghiem et al., 2004). This simulator has been used extensively for modelling CO2 storage in saline aquifers in the past five years. Pruess et al. (2003) and Zhang et al. (2007) describe a simulator for CO2 storage in aquifers with similar features. Solubility Trapping The accurate modeling of gas solubility in the aqueous phase (brine) is important as brine can dissolve a large amount of CO2.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle