Reduced Smell Activity May Point To Schizophrenia Predisposition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Clinical & Research NewsFull AccessReduced Smell Activity May Point To Schizophrenia PredispositionJoan Arehart-TreichelJoan Arehart-TreichelSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:17 Aug 2001https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.36.16.0018aSeveral years ago, Lili Kopala, M.D., a psychiatrist with Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, and her colleagues examined smell acuity in identical twins discordant for schizophrenia. The twins with schizophrenia had considerable olfaction impairment compared with healthy controls, but the twins without schizophrenia had some impairment as well. The unaffected twins’ performance fell midway between that of the affected twins and that of the healthy controls.Fifty-eight percent of patients with schizophrenia, 34 percent of nonschizophrenia subjects from families with schizophrenia, and 9 percent of healthy controls had senses of smell in the impaired range. “Impaired” was defined as a score on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test of less than 34 of 40 for men and less than 35 of 40 for women. (Source: Lili Kopala, M.D., et al., Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia)This finding made Kopala and her coworkers wonder whether smell impairment might indicate a genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia in persons coming from families with a genetic predisposition to the disease. So they decided to test their hypothesis in another study.The results, reported in the August American Journal of Psychiatry, confirm their hypothesis, Kopala and her colleagues believe.Kopala and her coworkers gave a smell identification test to three groups of subjects younger than age 65. The first group consisted of 19 individuals with schizophrenia who came from families that had had various members with schizophrenia throughout the generations. In other words, it was clear that a strong genetic predisposition to schizophrenia was present in these families.The second group consisted of 27 persons who also came from these families but who did not have schizophrenia. These individuals presumably had some genetic predisposition to schizophrenia as well, but had not developed schizophrenia.A third group consisted of 43 healthy volunteers who were matched for age and gender to each schizophrenia and nonschizophrenia subject; an adequate match for three subjects could not be found.The researchers then compared olfactory test results among the three groups. As they expected, subjects with schizophrenia performed worst on the test, healthy controls best, and subjects without schizophrenia but presumably with some genetic vulnerability to the disease in-between. Specifically, 58 percent of schizophrenia patients, 34 percent of nonschizophrenia subjects, and nine percent of healthy controls performed in the impaired range (see chart).Thus, “impaired olfactory deficits may aggregate in families with schizophrenia and may be indicative of a genetic predisposition to psychosis,” Kopala and her colleagues conclude.The report, “Impaired Olfactory Identification in Relatives of Patients with Familial Schizophrenia,” is posted on the journal’s Web site at ajp.psychiatryonline.org under the August issue.▪ AM J PSYCHIATRY20011581286 ISSUES NewArchived
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».