MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1968976232 · doi:10.2118/2004-181

Coarse Scale Simulation in Tight Gas Reservoirs

2004· article· en· W1968976232 sur OpenAlex
Mohamed Elahmady, R.A. Wattenbarger

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Établissements canadiensApache (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPetroleum engineeringScale (ratio)Tight gasReservoir simulationGeologyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceHydraulic fracturingPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract It is common for field models of tight gas reservoirs to include several wells with hydraulic fractures. These hydraulic fractures can be very long, extending for more than a thousand feet. A hydraulic fracture width is usually no more than about 0.02 ft. The combination of the above factors leads to the conclusion that there is a need to model hydraulic fractures in coarse grid blocks for these field models since it may be impractical to simulate these models using fine grids. In this paper, a method was developed to simulate a reservoir model with a single hydraulic fracture that passes through several coarse gridblocks. This method was tested and a numerical error was quantified that occurs at early time due to the use of coarse grid blocks. Introduction A single hydraulic fracture is conventionally modeled for research purposes using fine grids. In actual field models of tight gas reservoirs, there can be several wells with hydraulic fractures. These hydraulic fractures are usually very long. They can extend in length to be more than a thousand feet. These long hydraulic fractures extend for several gridblocks in a simulation model (Fig. 1). Therefore, it is very difficult to use fine grids to simulate these actual field models. Many authors1,2 suggested the replacement of the hydraulic fracture by an effective wellbore radius but this technique is only valid when the hydraulic fracture does not extend beyond the boundaries of one gridblock. There were also attempts by some authors3–5 to modify transmissiblities of the gridblocks, which contain hydraulic fractures however these attempts were done for hydraulically fractured horizontal wells. In addition, these attempts had several rules of thumb that had no basic theory behind them. In this paper, ways are showed to model hydraulic fractures in coarse gridblocks. Pseudo-permeability values were used to account for the hydraulic fracture passing through the coarse gridblock. An alternative way that was also shown in this chapter was to modify the transmissibilities of the gridblocks that contain the hydraulic fracture. WELL MODELS In radial flow, the calculated pressures in gridblocks containing wells pwb must be corrected to formation face pressure pwf. This correction is done using Peaceman's1 equation. Peaceman's6,7 equations are programmed into any conventional reservoir simulator for the case of radial flow. Elahmady8 repeated the same numerical experiments reported by Peaceman1 for the case of linear flow and reached a result that pwf=pwb for the case of linear flow. MODELING HYDRAULIC FRACTURES IN COARSE BLOCKS USING PSEUDOPERMEABILITIES Our objective in this section was to show how to model a single hydraulic fracture that passes through coarse gridblocks as shown in Fig. 2. The formulas shown below in Eq. 1 and Eq. 3 were derived by Elahmady8 for the pseudo-permeability in the x-direction (direction along the fracture) and in the y-direction (direction perpendicular to the fracture) respectively for the coarse gridblocks that have hydraulic fractures passing through them. Equation (1) (Available in full paper)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,408
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,956

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle