Reduction of Light Oil Usage as Power Fluid for Jet Pumping in Deep Heavy Oil Reservoirs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Jet pumping has been considered as an efficient artificial lifting technique for deep oil production due to its simplicity and lack of moving parts. If light oil is used as power fluid, jet pumping becomes one of the preferred artificial lift methods for the deep-heavy-oil reservoirs by dramatically reducing both viscosity of the reservoir fluid and the pressure loss along the production string. In practice, the amount of light oil required as the power fluid can be as high as three times of the reservoir fluid, among which only a small portion of the light oil is actually needed for viscosity reduction. In this paper, a novel technique has been developed and successfully applied to significantly reduce the amount of light oil usage in a deep-heavy-oil reservoir. More specifically, two approaches are developed and compared. As for Approach A, the oil well is produced with jet pumping driven by light oil first, and then the produced fluid is reinjected into the well as the power fluid. This process keeps circulating until viscosity of the produced fluid is too high to be utilized for jet pumping. As for Approach B, partial produced fluid is combined with the light oil at any reasonable ratios, and subsequently the produced fluid-light oil mixture is reinjected into the well as the power fluid. In the latter approach, viscosity of the mixture keeps increasing and will reach its equilibrium value in a few days, and thus, stable production will be achieved as well. Theoretic models are developed to determine the viscosity of the power fluid for each circulation and the maximum cycle number for the former approach as well as the equilibrium viscosity of the mixed power fluid and the optimum ratio of light oil to the produced fluid-light oil mixture for the latter approach. Field applications show that the reservoir fluid produced from deep heavy oil wells is increased by three times and that the amount of light oil can be reduced by more than 60% for either approach.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».