“Giving back” to the profession of psychology is a personal responsibility.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AbstractThe right of self-regulation stems to historic notions that members of profession had particular knowledge and skills, independence from government, and commitment to the public interest. Schultze (2007) argued that the model of self-regulation carries with it the responsibility for individual members to engage and participate in the maintenance and development of the profession. This paper discusses various ways in which psychologists, as clinicians, researchers, and teachers, can engage at local, provincial, and national levels, strengthen the profession of psychology, and continue to serve the public interest.Keywords: self-regulation, supervision, teaching, research, volunteerResumeLe droit l'autoregulation renvoie la notion historique que les membres d'une profession possedent des connaissances et des competences particulieres, une autonomie par rapport au gouvernement ainsi qu'un engagement l'egard de l'interet public. Selon Schultze (2007), le modele d'autoregulation comporte la responsabilite pour chacun des membres non seulement de s'engager envers le maintien et le developpement de la profession, mais aussi d'y participer. Cet article discute des diverses facons dont les psychologues - cliniciens, chercheurs et enseignants - peuvent jouer un role aux niveaux local, provincial et national, renforcer la psychologie en tant que profession et continuer de servir l'interet public.Mots-cles : autoregulation, supervision, enseignement, recherche, benevolat.Psychologists across Canada have been given the privilege of being part of self-regulated profession and, in my view, along with that privilege comes responsibility to give to the profession. The responsibility is not onerous as, simply, there are many ways in which to make contribution. From presenting guest lecture at local high school, college, or university to making the substantial commitment of serving as president of the Canadian Psychological Association (CPA), the opportunities range from dedicating couple of hours on one occasion to devoting large chunks of several years. Giving back also brings certain rewards, including staying connected to developments in the profession, learning from students and interns/residents, and enhancing one's sense of being part of broader professional community.Robert Schultze (2007) described how the history of selfregulated professions began with an initial notion, in the mid-19th century, of members in profession having combination of knowledge and skills, having a commitment to duty above selfinterest or personal gain (p. 41), and having independence from government interference. However, Schultze noted, by the end of the 19th century, the prestige of the profession and the market advantage of exclusive use of title overtook those earlier concepts. Courts and governments, Schultze suggested, have continued to hold that self-regulation is desirable only when that privilege serves the public interest. Schultze concluded,A key expectation of members of self-governing professions is that they accept legal and ethical responsibility for their work and hold the interest of the public and society as paramount. Individual members also have the responsibility to participate in the maintenance and development of the profession to keep it strong and healthy for the future. (p. 52)Drawing on the work of Allred (2002),1 Schultze (2007) kindly provided an introductory template to possible points of engagement for professionals looking to maintain and develop the profession, describing that self-regulated professions were, among other roles, responsible for determining requirements for entry into the profession, establishing and maintaining levels of competency, establishing and maintaining codes of ethics, addressing complaints about members, and developing disciplinary adjudication process. In short, in the realm of psychology, opportunities for volunteering include assisting in the development of standards for educational attainment for entry into the profession, teaching and supervising those interested in joining the profession, evaluating and registering those seeking to use the title of psychologist, implementing and updating disciplinary and aspirational codes of conduct, and responding to public complaints about members of the profession. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,010 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,018 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».