Learning to Teach Citizenship: A Lifelong Learning Approach
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Where do civics teachers learn about the content and methods of civics education? What is the impact of these learning experiences on their teaching approaches? Driven by these questions, we undertook a study with civics teachers in Ontario, Canada. Whereas citizenship education is often understood as occurring exclusively in formal schooling, and the preparation for teaching civics is usually conceived as occurring in pre-service teacher training, in this study we uncovered civic learning that occurs in nine formal, informal and nonformal settings: early family socialization to primary school, secondary school, pre-service training, other university programs, workshops and conferences, civic participation, the media, and the teaching of civics itself. In relation to the first question, the teachers reported that through a variety of lifelong and lifewide experiences they acquired different amounts and types of learning on civic knowledge, civic values, civic and political skills, political beliefs, and civics teaching. In order to address the second question, we explored the relationship between the civic learning experienced by teachers, on the one hand, and the content and methods of their teaching, on the other. The settings were found to differentially influence the competencies and pedagogical orientations that civics teachers bring to their classrooms. Informal settings, especially the family and civic participation, were particularly important for teaching about the workings of the political process and for modeling practices of political engagement. Even within the same setting, experiences that produced different impacts were identified. For instance, while the impact of the secondary school curriculum was negligible overall, some interviewees recalled one or two high school teachers as role models who would later influence their own teaching approaches. This study found that teachers' learning experiences, particularly those acquired through their own teaching of civics, provide them with competencies and attitudes that influence both their teaching approaches as well as their levels of political enlightenment and engagement.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».