MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1969954121 · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7543.681

Improving the management of dementia

2006· letter· en· W1969954121 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth England

Notice bibliographique

RevueBMJ · 2006
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealthcare Quality and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDementiaMedicinePsychological interventionPrimary careStatutory lawPsychiatryNursingFamily medicineDiseasePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The prevalence of dementia in the United Kingdom will have risen from the current 600 000 to 1.2 million by 2050, increasing the already considerable financial and social burdens of this disorder.1 In many countries, including in the United Kingdom, primary care is the first point of contact for many people with dementia, providing longitudinal support to families and coordinating ongoing multiagency management of dementia.2 Patients with early dementia and their families may not always get the early help they need, however. Early recognition and detection of dementia enables people with dementia and their families to better understand and come to terms with the diagnosis and to discuss future care. It also enables more timely access to treatments and drugs.3 With this in mind, a randomised controlled trial in this week's BMJ by Downs and colleagues (p 692) assesses the effectiveness of educational interventions in improving detection and management of dementia in primary care.4 Several studies in primary care have reported high levels of unmet need, with widespread underdetection of dementia, poor long term management of patients' problems, and low rates of referrals to specialist care and to other statutory agencies. This situation is not confined only to primary care in the United Kingdom.5 There are several reasons for these less than optimal standards of care. Dementia rarely presents with clear, well demarcated symptoms. Its diagnosis can be confusing, with symptoms sometimes mimicking other conditions. Members of primary care teams may feel that they have too little appropriate training in diagnosing dementia and providing treatment. Tools to aid diagnosis are often not culturally sensitive and can be biased by characteristics of both patients and informants such as age, sex, and education.6 Inadequate resources and poor cooperation between community services, specialist clinics, and primary care teams may also be barriers to good care.7 A thorough search of the literature yields few papers that examine the impact of educational interventions on detecting and managing dementia in primary care. Approaches such as introducing clinical practice guidelines and educational tools were ineffective and too expensive to implement and sustain or have failed to show changes in doctors' behaviour, in terms of detection rates or outcomes.8 This week, Downs and colleagues report that they, too, have found little evidence in their study to support any improvement in the diagnosis of dementia using guidelines alone.4 A Canadian study did find a positive effect of an educational and diagnostic toolkit on doctors' knowledge and confidence in dealing with dementia and driving.9 Downs and colleagues' study found a significant increase in the number of reported cases of dementia in practices where two educational initiatives—decision support software and practice based workshops—were introduced. These improvements did not extend, however, to increasing doctors' concordance with clinical guidelines on managing dementia. The authors argued that this might have reflected the low number of cases of dementia detected after the intervention and in the control arm, which affected the power of their study, and also incomplete recording in the medical records of any changes in doctors' behaviour.4 The wider evidence base on educational initiatives in primary care suggest that multifaceted interventions are the most effective ways to improve doctors' behaviour.10 More comprehensive initiatives might also improve doctors' knowledge of or attitudes to dementia care, as Downs and colleagues say, but such initiatives have not yet been formally evaluated.11 A more clinically oriented policy that might make a difference to the quality of care in dementia in the United Kingdom is the revised quality and outcomes framework of the NHS contract for general practitioners, which includes a new focus on dementia.12 Practices in England and Wales will be expected to show improved record keeping and ongoing management of patients with dementia, through the introduction of a dementia register and evidence that patients' care and needs have been reviewed in the preceeding 15 months. However, practitioners may find it difficult to reconcile the increased focus on dementia of the new NHS contract, which encourages earlier diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, with the recently published controversial guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), recommending drugs only in patients with later moderate Alzheimer's disease.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,811

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,120
Tête enseignante GPT0,457
Écart entre enseignants0,337 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations18
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBMJMême sujetHealthcare Quality and ManagementTravaux en français237 207