Suction Caisson Response Under Sustained Loop Current Loads
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The capacity of suction caissons to withstand uplift loads relies on suctionsinduced beneath the caisson base and within the internal soil plug. Thesesuctions can be relied upon for short-term loading such as due to wave action, but are more questionable for the sustained loading from loop currents, whereloading periods of several days or even weeks are possible. This paper combines results from centrifuge model tests and finite elementanalysis to elucidate relationships for the proportion of the short termcapacity that can be relied upon for various durations of loading on suctioncaissons. The paper addresses issued related to the reduction in holdingcapacity due to pore pressure dissipation effects. The combined results from finite element analysis and two independent sourcesof centrifuge testing present a consistent picture of long term suction caissonload holding capacity. Loads approaching the undrained capacity can besustained for a few months. Substantially lower loads can be held for extremelylong durations. Intermediate loads can be sustained for determinate lengths oftime dependent upon caisson dimensions and soil properties. For typical caisson geometries and consolidation properties relevant to Gulf ofMexico (GOM) conditions, it is found that there is negligible reduction incapacity for holding times of up to 100 days, which is well in excess of timesrelevant for loop currents, and that loads in the region of 85% of theshortterm capacity may be held for periods of up to 2 years with only smalldisplacements. The paper presents these and additional results and provides comments on theimplications for suction caisson foundation design under long term loading, such as would be encountered in mooring systems for floating productionstructures exposed to loop current loading like those commonly occurring in theGOM. Introduction Loop current considerations in the GOM are an important aspect of suctioncaisson design for facilities located in deepwater. Vukovich et al. (1979) havedescribed the characteristics of these loop currents. The circulation in the GOM is dominated by the loop current (LC), an energeticcurrent of warm water that enters the Gulf through the Yucatan Straits. As itenters the Gulf, it extends slightly to the north, loops back around to thesouth, and exits the Gulf through the Florida Straits. But the loop current isdynamic in nature and its position and strength change with time. Once or twicea year, it extends well to the north, forming an intense clockwise flow thatmay reach as far north as 29 deg. In an attempt to return to the more normalsoutherly extent, it slowly pinches off the extension, resulting in a closedcirculation and the generation of a warm-core, anticyclonic ring, or eddy. Thisloop current eddy (LCE), no longer constrained, migrates to the west at a rateof 2-4 km/day, bringing deep, strong currents to deepwater exploration andproduction operations along the way. loop current eddies can be 200-400 km indiameter, with swirl velocities of up to 5 knots and rotation rates of 5-10deg/day.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle