MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1971272206 · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2009.00562_1.x

Deep Inside by M. Willmott

2009· article· en· W1971272206 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandra Cox

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Howard Journal of Criminal Justice · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrisonArsonCriminologyPoliticsStupidityPoetryCasualHistorySociologyPsychologyLawArtLiteraturePolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Victoria, BC., Canada : Trafford ( 2007 ) 66pp. £7.50pb ISBN 978-1-4251-0989-9 This self-published collection of prison writings is an exemplar of the tradition of giving voice to the experience of incarceration and, in particular, to using that voice as a means of personal change. Willmott's book, a collection of prose and poetry ranging from the deeply personal and reflective to the spiritual and political, though perhaps never able to reach a wide readership, is, arguably, an important piece of documentary evidence about one man's expression of coping with, and resisting, the experience of incarceration. Willmott was 56 years old in 2005 when he was incarcerated for the first time after being convicted of arson. Willmott describes his passage to prison as one that was fuelled by his addiction to alcohol, and part of his book is devoted to his reflections on this addiction, the insights he drew from various spiritual traditions, particularly Christianity, as well as his reflections on his crime: in his poem ‘Arson’, Willmott writes: ‘… autumnal fires have the power of purging,/purifying the bugged soil for spring planting. And the light of the fire,/and the excitement,/the cleansing of fire/can heal encrustations’ (p.16). Willmott's prose is perhaps most powerful when he speaks of his struggles to cope in what he describes as ‘the institutional insanity of the prison unsystem’ (preface) He writes about those elements of prison life which were able to anchor him: fellow prisoners: ‘companions, comforters, inspirers, communicators, eye-openers – stability’ (p.10), and visits ‘A reminder of normality, sanity, trust, love, faith in your future: light through the tunnel’ (p.11). Willmott's writings are, broadly, an attempt to make sense of the ‘island of self’ that is ‘battered’ by the ‘unwantonness’ and ‘unmercifulness’ of the prison experience (p.32). Writing is one of a number of creative arts that have been found to impact on an individual's well-being while they are incarcerated (Hughes 2005). In a recent review of the literature on the use of the arts in imprisonment, creative writing was found to benefit core aspects of identity-building: ‘naming experiences to facilitate engagement and interaction with the world combines with increased consciousness of the impact of self on the world and vice versa’ (Hughes 2005, p.68). This is echoed by Willmott himself, who writes in his preface: ‘Writing helps self-analysis, making sense, keeping self together – hope’. Willmott, like many individuals in prison, faced a crisis of selfhood to whom he felt he needed to give voice. The unique form that this takes for Willmott, part memoir, part fiction, part spiritual reflection, is a form of self-narrative. Maruna, Wilson and Curran (2006) describe the crisis of self-narrative that is common amongst prisoners: ‘if adults are motivated to find meaning, construct coherence, and generally “make sense” of their lives in ways that maintain self-esteem, prisoners experience a particular challenge in this regard’ (p.168). They argue that ‘being imprisoned can cause individuals to see the fragility of the web of meaning they previously took for granted. This realization can lead to reflection on issues of existence, life, and death, which are usually bracketed from everyday consideration’ (p.169). Curran (2002) writes that self-narratives can aid personal coherence and unity, helping to establish meaning for one's life, and supporting identity (pp.92–3). Willmott's book – an attempt to ‘keep the mind alive in this most mind-destroying of places’ (preface), is an important testament to this process of identity building.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,710
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,661

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,319
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Howard Journal of Criminal JusticeMême sujetCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisTravaux en français237 207