MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1971282588 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2006.0075

The Soldierly Imagination: Narrating Fear in Defoe's Memoirs of a Cavalier

2006· article· en· W1971282588 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sharon Alker

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésKnightMemoirHERODramaLiteratureAppealLawArtSociologyHistoryPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Soldierly Imagination:Narrating Fear in Defoe’s Memoirs of a Cavalier Sharon Alker (bio) The representation of war in Daniel Defoe's Memoirs of a Cavalier (1720) is at the centre of two conflicting, yet equally convincing, textual readings by two of Defoe's biographers, Maximillian E. Novak and Paula R. Backscheider. Novak foregrounds Defoe's long-term admir a tion of military matters, arguing that the protagonist is "Defoe's ver sion of the ideal cavalier—brave, idealistic, fair."1 Novak points out that, as the text evolves, the young man learns that certain sorts of hero ism are ineffective, such as Prince Rupert's tendency to pursue and plunder fleeing regiments, while neglecting problems at the centre of the battle. And he labels one moment at the end of the text as disturbing—a moment in which the Cavalier has to engage in a mas sacre in a private home. He suggests that the soldier never recovers from this experience, but does not discuss the Cavalier's response in depth. Novak's approach to the memoirs primarily places the work within the traditional model of the military memoir, with its emphasis on martial accomplishments, heroism, stoicism, and soldierly duty.2 In contrast, Backscheider argues that Defoe's work primarily critiques war, that the power and appeal of the work [End Page 43] is located in "its utterly unexceptional hero, its pessimism, and its philosophically nihilistic conclusion."3 Backscheider contends that readers perceive Defoe's Cavalier as "the dramatization of the powerful anti-war sentiment that would sweep England" in the eigh teenth century, and compares Memoirs of a Cavalier to Ernest Hemingway's A Farewell to Arms or Joseph Heller's Catch 22, which feature "powerless, frustrated soldiers."4 The dissonance between these two readings can be partially attributed to the ambiguity that saturates much of Defoe's fictional work, yet the presence of both the heroic stoicism recognized by Novak and the expression of battlefield trauma noted by Backscheider also derives from the text's exploration of the relationship between narrative and war. This fictional memoir displays and disturbs the tendency of contemporary war narratives to elide the psychological trauma of combat, opening a space for a different sort of war literature, one that takes into account the effects of combat on the soldier's psyche.5 The Memoirs unsettles traditional military narratives at two interrelated levels. First, at the level of character, the Cavalier's description of his experiences as a young man explores the deployment of the rhetoric of honour and neo-Stoicism by military leaders to minimize the terror of combat, while testing the limits of this rhetoric under the particular pressures of a civil war. By rhetoric, here, I mean not only oral speeches, sermons, and other means of linguistic discourse, but also the entire framework, including rituals and other performative acts, that military leaders used to valorize sacrifice and make violence acceptable and desirable to their troops, such as visual displays of military discipline in exercises and public exhibitions. The function of this rhetoric is to enable soldiers to breach social norms, to control their emotional responses to the battlefield, and to kill and be killed with minimal fear or horror. Second, at a level of narration, Memoirs operates as a meta-commentary on the war literature circulating in the period. Prose narratives centred on the military reproduced the rhetoric of the battlefield, interweaving it with a focus on detailed [End Page 44] reporting on military tactics and strategies.6 Memoirs destabilizes this language by exposing gaps between the events and their reporting, between stoic language and the soldier's psyche, raising questions about the horrors of war that such works elide. Narratives of war are not clearly distinct from the rhetoric of war disseminated by military leaders, but dynamically engaged with it. The narrator's admiration for the rhetoric of Gustavus Adolphus is evident in his textual repetition and articulation of the noble ideals that the Swedish leader espouses. And the proliferation of manuals in the period suggests that military leaders used ideas and language circulated in these guides, and that they were influenced by other textual forms, such as...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,985
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,976

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,258
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207