MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1971631259 · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1789

Adult womenʼs experiences of urinary incontinence: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol

2015· review· en· W1971631259 sur OpenAlex
Adilson Mendes, Luíza Akiko Komura Hoga, Bruna Goulart Gonçalves, Pamela Silva, Priscilla Perez da Silva Pereira

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · 2015
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePelvic floor disorders treatments
Établissements canadiensAdidas (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésUrinary incontinenceMedicineUrinationQuality of life (healthcare)Urinary LeakagePopulationGerontologyUrinary systemUrologyInternal medicineEnvironmental healthNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Review question/objective The objective of this review is to identify the best available evidence on the experience of urinary incontinence by women. Background Urinary incontinence (UI) dramatically affects the physical, emotional, psychological and social aspects of and the quality of life of women who suffer from the condition. Men and women experience the consequences of UI independently of their age. Aging women are more affected by this condition.1 The significant increase in longevity in women from 73.2 in 1997 to 76.5 in 20072 contributed to the aggravation of UI rates. Currently, UI is an epidemic medical problem.3 Urinary incontinence is defined by the International Continence Society as involuntary urine loss, leading to social and/or hygienic problems. There are three common types of UI. Stress UI (SUI) refers to urine loss provoked by exertion. Urge UI refers to a constant sense of urgency to urinate. Mixed UI (MUI) refers to urine leakage resulting from SUI and urge UI.4 Approximately 200 million people worldwide are affected by UI. 5 Urinary incontinence rates vary according to the population studied and the type of UI that is analyzed. It is estimated that between 10% and 55% of females from 15 to 64 years of age are affected by UI; SUI has the highest prevalence.5 A multicenter study consisting of 17,080 subjects of both sexes was performed in multiple European countries6 to estimate the UI rate. The prevalence of UI was 44% in France, 42% in the United Kingdom (UK), 41% in Germany and 23% in Spain. Approximately only 24% of the women in Spain and the UK who were affected by any type of UI consulted a doctor regarding this condition. The search for medical support was higher in France (33%) and Germany (40%).6 The prevalence of UI in a study in China, with a sample of 19,024 women aged 20-99 years, was 30.9%.7 Among the women who visited a gynecological clinic in the United Arab Emirates, the prevalence of UI was 42.2%.8 These women reported that aspects of their lives most affected by UI were physical and social activities, and sex. Nevertheless, 50.5% of the women did not seek medical care. The hope for a spontaneous resolution of UI (61.9%), embarrassment at being examined by a clinician (35.9%), the belief that urine leakage is a normal occurrence (31.5%), and lack of awareness regarding the availability of treatment (23.9%) were the subjects' reasons for not seeking UI treatment.7 Other researchers reported that an average of 25% of women affected by UI seek medical treatment.6,9 Many efforts have been made to improve the quality of life of women with UI but these efforts need to include a better understanding of the degree to which women are affected by UI.1,10 There is evidence that UI seriously affects the daily life of women with this condition. The main difficulties associated with UI are related to the lack of an avenue for those affected by UI to share their UI problems and the stigma associated with the condition. As a consequence, the women experience difficulties establishing constructive interpersonal interactions with others experiencing similar problems. Women may experience fear and shame regarding UI. Typically, the consequences of this condition are experienced by these women alone, leading to isolation. Often this is because of the social stigma associated with UI.1 As a result, women often have difficulty seeking social support and treatment. The women affected by UI may experience restrictions in sexual, social, family and occupational activities as a consequence of this condition. Their self-esteem may also be affected, and financial problems could arise because of the effect of UI on work activities.11 The International Incontinence Society is of the view that the personal and social problems associated with UI can be demonstrated in an objective way. 12 Through a preliminary search of primary studies focusing on the experience of UI, international research on this topic was identified. Healthcare providers need to provide healthcare for women affected by UI through the best evidence available. The proposal to conduct this systematic review of qualitative evidence is timely to enhance understanding of the perspectives of women affected by UI. The identification of the similarities and differences in the experiences of women affected by UI from different cultures and social contexts can support and promote the implementation of evidence-based healthcare. A basic principle of evidence-based healthcare is ascertaining knowledge on the patient's perspective and incorporating this into the planning and implementation of healthcare. In this systematic review, the experiences of women will be considered, independent of their age, and from the physical, emotional, social and cultural perspectives. An initial search for sources was undertaken to determine whether a previous review addressing this question had been undertaken or was in progress. The Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports and the CINAHL databases were examined. No reviews, completed or in process of being conducted, focusing on the experiences related to female UI were found in these databases. A systematic review focusing on the experience of UI was undertaken and published in 2009 by Brazilian researchers.6 It was conducted using meta-ethnography in which the focus was primarily cultural perspectives. This systematic review will approach the topic more comprehensively and will include all the qualitative studies independently of the method used in the primary studies. This systematic review aims to include all aspects of the female experience of UI in addition research findings published after 2009.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,016
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Revue systématique · Signal consensuel: Revue systématique
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0160,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0110,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,198
Tête enseignante GPT0,521
Écart entre enseignants0,323 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle