MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1971636450 · doi:10.1353/mrw.2013.0000

Magic and Witchcraft Historicized, Localized, and Ethnicized: A Response to Stephen Mitchell’s Witchcraft and Magic in the Nordic Middle Ages

2013· article· en· W1971636450 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Thomas A. DuBois

Notice bibliographique

RevueMagic, ritual, and witchcraft · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMAGIC (telescope)Middle AgesScholarshipIndigenousMythologyChristianityHistoryClassicsPleasureEarly ChristianityLiteratureArtAncient historyLawPsychologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Magic and Witchcraft Historicized, Localized, and EthnicizedA Response to Stephen Mitchell's Witchcraft and Magic in the Nordic Middle Ages Thomas A. Dubois Keywords Scandanavia, Witchcraft, Middle Ages, Early Modern Europe, Inuit, Sámi, Christianity, Indigenous Religion, Syncretism, Myth, Sagas, Ethnicity Important works deserve serious discussion. The book that stands at the focus of this symposium is a welcome addition to a long and copious body of scholarship concerning the topics of magic and supernatural aggression in medieval Scandinavia. Stephen A. Mitchell's Witchcraft and Magic in the Nordic Middle Ages is a solid and useful work, full of valuable insights and well suited to both scholarly study and the classroom. It is my pleasure to respond here to Mitchell's work, providing below both a summary of what I regard as some of the work's strongest contributions and suggesting a few areas of further research that might proceed from the foundation created by this work. Mitchell presents and explores the Nordic region as an area defined by both the continuity of pre-Christian traditions and the doctrines and lore of imported European Christendom. Both the idea of practitioners skilled in communicating with the supernatural and that of supernatural aggression instigated by people bearing ill will toward rivals were accepted elements of both pre-Christian and Christian worldviews in the Nordic region during the medieval period. Thus, one of the tasks for the modern scholar—as for writers of the medieval sagas, vitae, and other documents surveyed in Mitchell's study—was to differentiate between "old" and "new" lore, native and foreign. In many cases, fusion between the two sets of beliefs was so complete and normalized that it is difficult and misleading to try to separate the sources out. In other cases, the sources' stance on supernatural occurrences depends not so much on the acts themselves as on the practitioner: supernatural acts by a witch lead to castigation and suppression, while similar acts by saints are treated as valued miracles. Belief in the existence of miracles necessitated [End Page 82] belief in the existence of demonic aggression, and the medieval Christian had little doubt regarding either. Mitchell focuses on textual evidence from a philological-folkloristic perspective. He examines sagas, law codes, and various products of Christian institutions in detail for what they tell us about imagined or actual concepts of witchcraft and magic. This textual focus, of course, brings with it a set of thorny methodological questions, particularly related to the fact that most of the written materials left to us (apart from some runic inscriptions and arguably, some of the skaldic and mythological poetry) were produced not in a pre-Christian environment but within a consciously Christian institutional setting. Questions of textual accuracy or, more pointedly, of textual agenda come to the fore, particularly in any discussion of avowedly pre-Christian or conversion-era traditions. The scholar is obligated to make careful (ultimately conjectural) judgments regarding the reasons why a given writer chose to include a description of a magic practice or ritual in a given text, despite the writer's own often emphatically Christian identity. As Mitchell shows, drawing on a century of research along these lines, no hard-and-fast rules obtain for making such judgments. Rather, the task of the analyst is to arrive at the most probable explanation for each specific textual instance within its context of production and reception. Mitchell's study contributes admirably to this piecemeal process, reconciling at various points the more strident and disputed positions of earlier or contemporary scholars. Added to the issue of Christian agenda is the fact that the materials left to us—be they textual or material—often evince a startling blending of native pre-Christian and imported continental materials, arriving in the region through the rich medium of Latin learning and representing centuries of evolving understandings of nature and the supernatural. A single thirteenth-century text such as Snorri's Prose Edda or Heimskringla can combine descriptions of the pre-Christian god Óðinn, medieval accounts of saints' miracles, and details of Virgil's Aeneid into a single, seemingly unified understanding that nonetheless bristles with internal contradictions and ambiguities. The scholar's work is...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,777
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,181 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMagic, ritual, and witchcraftMême sujetHistorical and Archaeological StudiesTravaux en français237 207