MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1971926640 · doi:10.1353/can.2004.0082

For Patients of Moderate Means: A Social History of the Voluntary Public General Hospital in Canada, 1890-1950 (review)

2004· article· en· W1971926640 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Annmarie Adams

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPublic hospitalInstitutionPublic institutionGeneral hospitalVoluntary associationNarrativeSociologyHistoryMedicineNursingPolitical scienceFamily medicineSocial scienceLawArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: For Patients of Moderate Means: A Social History of the Voluntary Public General Hospital in Canada, 1890-1950 Annmarie Adams For Patients of Moderate Means: A Social History of the Voluntary Public General Hospital in Canada, 1890-1950. David Gagan and Rosemary Gagan. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2002. Pp. xii, 268. $49.95 David Gagan and Rosemary Gagan's For Patients of Moderate Means: A Social History of the Voluntary Public General Hospital in Canada, 1890-1950 is a broad look at the evolution of Canadian hospitals. Its organization is both thematic and chronological. A history of the voluntary general hospital from the late nineteenth century to the birth of government-sponsored hospital insurance constitutes the first three chapters. During these six decades the hospital evolved from an institution mostly for the sick poor, to an essential modern institution for all Canadians. Chapters four to six look at the major stakeholders in the voluntary public hospital: doctors, nurses, and patients. 'Mrs Jones and Mr Grant,' a chapter on patients' experiences that includes a fascinating 'tour' of a typical hospital, is particularly interesting.Its narrative style recalls Guenter B. Risse's Mending Bodies, Saving Souls, in which each chapter revolves around a fictional character. Indeed, throughout this jargon-free and meticulously researched book, the Gagans portray the stakeholders of the Canadian hospital as so many actors in a great drama. Particularly [End Page 632] gripping are their accounts of how the medical profession used the hospital to justify the cultural authority of scientific medicine and how social class determined the quality of medical care that hospitalized Canadians received in the early twentieth century. Gagan and Gagan's considerable interest in quantitative methods is showcased in the book's appendices. No fewer than nineteen charts and graphs analyse admissions, hospital costs, patient data, births, duration of stay, patient mortality, and a host of other statistics. This unprecedented wealth of data on the Canadian hospital is a treasury for researchers in the history of Canadian medicine. For Patients of Moderate Means breaks new ground in three important ways. Although the book explores a familiar time, it is the first attempt at a synthetic history of Canadian hospitals. Until now, that is, Canadian scholars have mostly studied individual institutions or regional hospital typologies. Still, the book would not have been possible without the pioneering case studies of J.T.H. Connor, Geoffrey Reaume, Denis Goulet, and Shelley Hornstein, as well as David Gagan's own 'A Necessity Among Us': The Owen Sound General and Marine Hospital 1891-1985. Second, Gagan and Gagan are well versed in the surveys on early-twentieth-century hospitals in the United States, and thus ask early on how our hospitals evolved differently from those south of the border. And third, the authors have relied on an impressive array of sources and used both qualitative and quantitative methods to paint a complex portrait of the modern institution. These same innovations underscore the book's limitations. For Patients of Moderate Means purports in its subtitle to be a Canadian survey, but the authors actually generalize not from national data but from in-depth research in specific places such as Cornwall, Owen Sound, St Catharines, Toronto, Winnipeg, and Vancouver. Second, the answer to whether Canada's hospital evolution is distinct is, disappointingly, no. In the end, the book suggests that our hospitals followed a similar course to those studied by Risse, Charles Rosenberg, Morris Vogel, Rosemary Stevens, and others. And finally, the authors' archival bias towards money and people means that readers are given little sense of the hospital as a real place - located in a particular spot, constructed of special materials, and arranged in a careful way. Sadly, the book does not include a single photograph of a Canadian hospital. Still, For Patients of Moderate Means opens a new era in the history of Canadian hospitals. While the present and future of the Canadian hospital remain murky, its past is notably clearer. Annmarie Adams McGill University Copyright © 2004 University of Toronto Press

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,999
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,423

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,012
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,215
Écart entre enseignants0,194 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207