420 SUPERSTIMULATION OF ANGUS DONORS WITH A SINGLE INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTION OF FOLLTROPIN®-V
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Two experiments were designed to determine the superovulatory response of Angus donors treated with a single injection of Folltropin®-V diluted in a slow release formulation (SRF; Bioniche Animal Health Inc., Belleville, Ontario, Canada). Experiment 1 was designed to compare superovulatory response in Angus donor cows (n = 29 per group) treated with a single i.m. injection of Folltropin®-V diluted in SRF with cows treated using the traditional twice-daily i.m. injection treatment schedule. On Day 0, all cows received 5 mg of estradiol-17ß plus 50 mg of progesterone and a Cue-Mate® (Bioniche Animal Health). On Day 4, cows were superstimulated with 400 mg of NIH-FSH-P1 Folltropin®-V in twice-daily decreasing doses over 4 days or in a single i.m. injection in the neck. The single injection was prepared by diluting the Folltropin®-V lyophilized powder in 1 mL of saline for injection and mixed with 9 mL of the SRF in the syringe immediately before administration. In the am and pm of Day 6, all cows received PGF2 and Cue-Mates® were removed in the pm. In the am of Day 8, cows received 12.5 mg of porcine LH (Lutropin®-V; Bioniche Animal Health) and were inseminated 12 and 24 h later. Ova/embryos were collected nonsurgically on Day 15 and evaluated following IETS recommendations. Means were compared between groups by t-test Mean (±SEM) number of ova/embryos and transferable embryos were 13.7 ± 2.1 and 7.1 ± 1.3 v. 12.3 ± 1.5 and 5.3 ± 0.8 for donors treated with the single v. twice-daily injections, respectively (P > 0.4). Experiment 2 was designed to confirm the results of Experiment 1 and to compare the effect of different dosages of Folltropin®-V on embryo production in Angus cows. Cows (n = 23) were superstimulated by 6 treatment protocols (2 × 3 factorial) in a crossover design (i.e. all cows received the 6 treatments and all treatments were represented on each collection day). Cows received the same treatments as cows in Experiment 1 except that the dosages of Folltropin®-V used were 200, 300, or 400 mg. Statistical analysis (ANOVA) revealed a significant effect of dosage of Folltropin®-V on embryo production, but there was no effect of treatment (i.e. single v. twice-daily injections; P > 0.2), nor was there a treatment by dosage interaction (P > 0.7). Mean (± SEM) number of ova/embryos and transferable embryos were 10.3 ± 0.9 and 5.4 ± 0.6 v. 11.3 ± 0.6 and 5.6 ± 0.5 for donors treated with the single or twice-daily injections, respectively (P > 0.2). Furthermore, the mean number of ova/embryos and transferable embryos were higher in cows treated with 400 mg (13.9 ± 1.1 and 6.5 ± 0.7) and 300 mg (12.0 ± 1.0 and 6.1 ± 0.7) of Folltropin®-V than those treated with 200 mg (6.6 ± 0.7 and 4.0 ± 0.5). In summary, superstimulation of Angus donor cows with a single i.m. injection of Folltropin®-V diluted in an SRF resulted in comparable embryo production to the traditional twice-daily i.m. administration of Folltropin®-V over 4 days. Although response did not differ between 300 and 400 mg, results suggest that 300 mg of Folltropin®-V given i.m. by a single or twice-daily injections is the most appropriate dose for Angus donor cows.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».