MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1972307509 · doi:10.1353/can.2011.0064

Into Deep Waters: Evangelical Spirituality and Maritime Calvinistic Baptist Ministers 1790–1855 (review)

2011· article· en· W1972307509 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Phyllis D. Airhart

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBaptismSpiritualityFaithTheologyReligious studiesSanctificationSociologyHistoryLawPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Into Deep Waters: Evangelical Spirituality and Maritime Calvinistic Baptist Ministers 1790–1855 Phyllis Airhart Into Deep Waters: Evangelical Spirituality and Maritime Calvinistic Baptist Ministers 1790–1855. Daniel C. Goodwin. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2010. Pp. 336, $90.00 The institutionalization of religious movements is generally associated with a waning of the ideals that inspired their founders. Daniel C. Goodwin sees a different pattern of development in his study of the aftermath of the New Light revivals that swept through Nova Scotia and New Brunswick in the eighteenth century. By focusing on the lives of six ministers, he argues that the second generation of leaders effectively adapted the faith of ‘the Fathers,’ thereby ensuring the success of the Calvinist Baptists for the rest of the century. Central to his argument is his identification of what he calls a ‘trilateral spirituality’ that combined three distinctive features of New Light evangelicalism: revival meetings, the conversion experience, and believer’s baptism. In so doing, the second generation salvaged and even strengthened the movement by resolving some of the tensions that had surfaced in encounters with the ‘formalism’ of its rivals. [End Page 730] The title Into Deep Waters highlights the importance of ‘dipping’ (as adult baptism by immersion was called) during this adaptation. Goodwin’s sources contain vivid descriptions of baptismal services, many of them dramatic riverside ceremonies that scandalized Anglicans, Methodists, Presbyterians, and others who practised infant baptism. In the heated debates that ensued, Baptists gained a competitive advantage over Methodists in particular, for immersion so aptly ritualized the conversion experience that both were emphasizing (138). He sees the powerful appeal of baptismal spirituality as crucial not only in attracting new members but in rescuing the New Light movement from its own past, which had been characterized by antinomianism, antiformalism, and emotionalism. By welding order and discipline to the distinctive features of New Light spirituality, the second generation took steps to deal with some potentially ruinous predicaments they had inherited: the heterodoxy, sex scandals, and violence unleashed by the exuberance of the founding generation. Harris Harding, Joseph Crandall, Edward Manning, Charles Tupper, Ingraham E. Bill, and Samuel Elder are not names that are well known outside a small circle of scholars who study Baptist history. Goodwin presents them, warts and all, as men driven by their quest for both souls and social status. Some come across as unlikely ‘heroes.’ The reader discovers, for instance, that Harding claimed ‘the Divel’ made him impregnate a teenager out of wedlock. Elder is an odd or at least ironic choice as the last of the notables. He evidently regarded his own ministry as ‘barren,’ and Goodwin provides no indication that this self-assessment was too harsh. His chapter illustrates the challenges of turning six case studies into a coherent whole, for standing alone it would seem to indicate the failure of the second generation to emulate the piety of the past. Goodwin may be attempting to show just how complex the process of adaptation was, but if his aim is to counter the association of institutionalization with religious decline, it is not clear how Elder supports it. Goodwin provides a sensitive reading of the sources and a wealth of fascinating detail – perhaps too much, at times – as he stitches together the biographies to develop his argument. The profiles include a fascinating picture of the problems Baptist leaders faced in their efforts to deal with travelling evangelists and settled ministers, professional and charismatic styles of leadership, and laity suspicious of educated ministers. While the focus is on six men, the reader also catches glimpses of women in various roles – temptress, wife, moral mother, and ‘exhorter’ encouraging others to live holy lives. Goodwin is particularly attentive to the family relationships that were complicated by the demands of the pastoral calling. He deals deftly with the [End Page 731] theological nuances of his material, although readers unfamiliar with beliefs and practices of Baptists and their rivals may tire of sorting through their differences. On the other hand, a more detailed social profile of the movement would have been welcome, especially given the allure of respectability for many second-generation leaders. Were their educational and...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,987
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207