A cautionary tale of BK virus
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Solid organ transplant recipients require lifelong immunosuppressive therapy to prevent rejection of their graft. However, this relatively nonspecific immunosuppression leaves the patient vulnerable to viral infections. BK virus (BKV) has become a common infection, which can lead to an inflammatory process in the kidney and may lead to graft loss. At this point in time, the only treatment for BKV is the reduction in immunosuppression. BKV is estimated to have a seroprevalence rate of around 75% in the adult population worldwide, while potentially exceeding 90% 1, 2. In most cases, the virus remains latent in urinary epithelium and poses no threat to the individual 3. However, if a patient develops BK viremia, most transplant centers reduce immunosuppression to prevent occurrence of frank nephropathy. Some investigators have posted that BK viremia may in fact serve as a crude marker of T cell immune competence 4. Given this, it is quite possible that complete resolution of viremia may increase vulnerability to alloimmune responses. As the development of donor-specific HLA antibodies has been shown to be a major cause of graft loss, the question of whether the decrease in immunosuppression obligated to eradicate BKV may lead to an increased risk of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Our center retrospectively reviewed 248 charts of kidney and kidney–pancreas transplant recipients to observe the incidence of BKV, and of the patients who developed BKV, which ones developed DSA. The incidence of BK viremia at our center was found to be 14.1% (n = 35). All patients were treated with cessation of their anti metabolite and kept on dual therapy of tacrolimus and prednisone, with tacrolimus trough levels targeted at 4–8 ng/ml. Upon review of the patients with BK viremia, three patients developed de novo DSA with a BK viral load of less than 2000 copies that we will define as not persistent BK viremia. De novo DSA was not found in patients with persistent BK viremia of more than 2000 copies. No patients had pretransplant DSA and all developed DSA only after the BK viral load fell to less than 2000 copies; thus, 3 of 35 patients developed DSA within a year period. The incidence of de novo DSA in negative BK patients is 16 of 213 patients (7.5%). The number of patients in our study is not large, but it does support the concept that BKV may indeed be a biomarker for immune suppression. However, it also underscores the need for constant vigilance in this delicate balance. It may be possible that eradication of virus may not be ideal, but rather low levels may be a more appropriate goal. In any case, these cases offer a cautionary message regarding the need to study this issue in powered and randomized studies. The authors have declared no conflicts of interest. None.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».