How Technology Is Radically Reshaping Supply, Demand, and the Energy of Geopolitics
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Guest editorial To understand how radically the energy industry is changing, consider this: The United States is the number one producer of natural gas in the world. Given appropriate policy and smart investments, it could eventually attain energy independence. What is driving this energy revolution? Technology. Cutting-edge hardware and software are unlocking geological potential in places and ways hardly imaginable even a few years ago, and energy companies now rank among the most important—and sophisticated—technology pioneers in the world. Great Game 2.0 and the Power of One The global energy map has been redrawn and expanded by technology. Whereas the “Great Game”—the often violent scramble among nations for control of territories harboring energy reserves—is still relevant, today it has become equally, if not more, important to control the technology assets, the hardware, and the software. Thus, the game has changed. New technologies have empowered nations, and they have made corporations and individuals active participants in the energy game. Smart meters, the Internet, and advanced software allow individuals to fine-tune energy consumption, underscoring the “Power of One”—the ability of every person to proactively manage his or her energy consumption and carbon footprint. This generational change is a function of heightened awareness of the impact of energy consumption on household expenses, foreign policy, and the environment. Energy consumption is no longer an economic act; it is becoming a conscious act and an act of conscience. By understanding and managing energy use, individuals can save money, companies can increase profits, and both can lessen their environmental impact. Everyone wins. Danger Ahead—A License to Operate? The breakneck pace of the energy technology revolution has likely masked inherent risks, especially in terms of the environment and public reaction. The expansion of hydraulic fracturing and the accelerated production of the Canadian oil sands coincided with the global economic crisis that began in 2008. This initially blunted reaction to potential dangers of new energy technologies, because the general public was absorbed by its core economic concerns and thus inclined to think more about the savings from less expensive energy than about environmental concerns. Essentially, in the competition between desire for cheaper energy and fear of the eco-consequences of fossil fuels, desire was at the forefront. Today, environmental concerns are again front and center because of the recent series of energy-linked environmental challenges and public concerns: the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, the Fukushima nuclear incident, the controversy over hydraulic fracturing, and more. The unsettled nature of these concerns means companies still have not secured a free and clear “license to operate” from the public. Our knowledge of the potential and consequences of new technologies is in its infancy. “The Great Game 2.0” may well decide which countries and companies emerge as enduring powers in the 21st century.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».