MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1972502404 · doi:10.1353/utq.2006.0199

"Real" Indians and Others: Mixed-Blood Urban Native Peoples and Indigenous Nationhood (review)

2006· article· en· W1972502404 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jean‐Paul Restoule

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousPoliticsIdentity (music)SociologyNegotiationGender studiesTreatyDiversity (politics)HistoryMedia studiesEthnologyLawAnthropologySocial sciencePolitical scienceAesthetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: 'Real'Indians and Others: Mixed-Blood Urban Native Peoples and Indigenous Nationhood Jean-Paul Restoule (bio) Bonita Lawrence . 'Real'Indians and Others: Mixed-Blood Urban Native Peoples and Indigenous NationhoodUniversity of British Columbia Press. xviii, 308. $34.95 Bonita Lawrence's work draws on first-person interviews to provide a descriptive overview of identity politics for urban Aboriginal people. This work is framed by, and situated within, an analysis of legislative and political definitions of Indian identity imposed by various settler governments since the nineteenth century. Essentially, Lawrence argues that the division, exclusion, and entitlements created historically by the Indian Act and treaty negotiation practices are responsible for the often intricate and puzzling social categories of Indian identities and politics practised and experienced by Aboriginal people today. In attempting to illuminate the difficult choices, challenges, and ruptures that influence Aboriginal people in urban settings, it is quite easy to get lost. To keep the reader focused, Lawrence continually returns to the way in which colonialist definitions have created and contribute to this confusion. Using twenty-nine interviews as the primary data, Lawrence's study features a diversity within Aboriginal communities. This study composition makes Lawrence's work quite complex. Every aspect that potentially divides Aboriginal people - including gender, ties to land and community, blood quantum, knowledge and use of language and culture - is described in all its complexity. This is no easy feat. If at times Lawrence constructs convoluted sentences to portray the various exceptions, and historical derivations and detours of identity discourses, it is because there is no simple way to relate this history. An unfortunate side effect may be that some readers will become confused. But if they're confused trying just to understand Lawrence's analytic and descriptive approach to urban Aboriginal identity, it only serves to underscore what it's like for the people in her study who have to live it. Academic study of urban Aboriginal identity has proliferated in the past ten years. The basic research undertaken for this book pre-dated many important developments in the urban Aboriginal landscape, so don't look for any discussion of the impact of the Corbiere decision or the federal [End Page 177] government's Urban Aboriginal Strategy. This timing also explains the absence of key urban Aboriginal identity literature such as Deborah Jackson's insightful book Our Elders Lived It! (2002) and the edited collections by Susan Lobo and Kurt Peters (American Indians and the Urban Experience, 2000) and David Newhouse and Evelyn Peters (Not Strangers in These Parts, 2003). But the title of the book highlights the mixed-blood aspect of identity and Lawrence draws on mixed-blood literature extensively. While admirably picking apart the paradoxes of the racial identity of Métisness, Lawrence surprisingly underestimates the reality of a distinct Métis cultural identity on the plains. Early on, Lawrence admits the work will have an eastern Canadian bias and indeed, this is true - Métisness on the plains is more than a by-product of treaty negotiations and the Indian Act. But there are many strengths in Lawrence's approach. Her chapter detailing how sexism influenced Indian identities is already becoming a classic, used as it is in several introductory area studies courses. Also noteworthy is Lawrence's handling of issues of appearance. Light-skinned Aboriginal people and their exclusion from Aboriginal life by 'Hollywood ' Indians have been fleetingly addressed by others, but the privilege they enjoy has rarely been discussed so well as here. Lawrence's analysis of light-skinned Aboriginal privilege is both original and overdue. Lawrence also uses this work to illuminate the players and the field in the inevitable battle that is to come over the Indian Act's phasing out of status Indians through intermarriage. She has shown how and why urban Aboriginal people will play a key role in this coming fight, in particular those who have gained advanced education and middle-class socioeconomic status as a result of their Indian status and Aboriginal rights. This book serves as a wake-up call to Aboriginal people in both urban areas and rural reserves. Lawrence warns that as we fight each other over socially constructed...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,981
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,038

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207