Perspectives of young people and their parents in the transition of cochlear implant services: Implications for improved service delivery
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
OBJECTIVES: Youth and young adults with cochlear implants are now transitioning from pediatric to adult services in increasing numbers. Research in other areas of health care has indicated that there is a gap in the transition from pediatric services for the young adult, and that it is important to obtain their perspectives to reduce disruption and improve care. Previous research has documented issues from the perspective of cochlear implant professionals. The objectives of this study were to examine current practices from the perspective of young adults and their families and to make recommendations for future practice. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 11 individuals, including cochlear implant recipients and their parents. All patients were within 4 years of transition between pediatric and adult hospital services: four youths were pediatric patients, and two had been discharged to adult services. Qualitative research methodology was used to identify key themes. RESULTS: All participants indicated that they had not anticipated a change to an adult hospital as part of their plan of care. Key themes from interviews were differences between pediatric and adult hospitals, challenges in establishing new relationships with professionals, specific concerns about new health care settings and procedures, and the need for youth to develop independent health-related skills in the context of parental involvement. DISCUSSION: Themes identified through interviews with young people with cochlear implants and their parents were similar to research in other areas of health care, as well as to themes identified in focus groups with professionals providing cochlear implant services. There were some differences which highlight both needs in the provision of health care and opportunities for providers and patients to collaborate to provide improved service delivery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle