The Impact of Oil Viscosity Heterogeneity on the Production Characteristics of Tar Sand and Heavy Oil Reservoirs. Part II: Intelligent, Geotailored Recovery Processes in Compositionally Graded Reservoirs
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Compositional and fluid property gradients are common and documented in conventional heavy oilfields and in super heavy oil occurrences such as oil sand reservoirs. In the severely biodegraded oils of both Athabasca and Peace River oil sand reservoirs, highly non-linear vertical and lateral chemical compositional and fluid viscosity gradients are common and have been shown to dramatically impact existing generation recovery processes such as SAGD and CSS. The fluid and geological heterogeneities at a variety of spatial scales in heavy oil and bitumen reservoirs, combined with the dynamic evolution of produced fluids during solvent or thermal recovery, should be integrated into recovery methods tailored to each reservoir which are operated using time-variant production strategies informed by produced fluid composition, flow rates and detailed history matching. We describe here, two new approaches of a new generation of transitional and initial thermal recovery processes that take advantage of mobility gradients: JAGD (J-well and Gravity Drainage) and gSAGD (mobility ratio optimized SAGD), which demonstrate significant improvements in recovery, economics and, thus, carbon dioxide emissions over existing thermal methods. Well configurations tailored to specific reservoir geometries and properties as well as fluid property distributions for primary thermal recovery increase initial production by 50 to 100%. Substantial cost savings are achieved in transitional cold primary to thermal secondary recovery methods (JAGD) by using a production J-well placed below what is initially a CHOPS production well, which is then later used to inject steam, as in SAGD. Three-dimensional reservoir simulations predict 25% more oil recovery with up to a 50% decrease in cumulative steam-oil ratio compared to standard SAGD in an identical reservoir. The JAGD process has many similarities to SAGD, such as steam trap control and potential for low pressure and solvent-assisted operation. Such geotailored processes (processes tailored, operated and optimized to reservoir fluid and geological heterogeneities) are expected to outperform conventional 'off the shelf' well placement designs and operating strategies. Introduction The bulk of the world's petroleum resources are stored in heavy oil and oil sand reservoirs. While some of this resource can be recovered by geotolerant (tolerant of unfavourable geology) recovery processes such as mining, these procedures are only suitable for shallow resources, are very costly and have high carbon dioxide emissions and other environmental penalties. Most of the world's heavy oil and bitumen resources are too deep to mine and so in situ recovery methods predominate. In situ recovery of viscous and poor quality oils currently relies on either high pressure primary production, as in cold heavy oil production, or thermal and/or solvent-based methods to mobilize the oil by reducing its viscosity. Average recoveries from heavy oil and oil sand reservoirs are typically low ranging from 5 to 15% for cold heavy oil production and from 30 to 85% for steam-based in situ processes. However, such processes are not very geotolerant. Also, profit margins are small because of high capital and operational costs.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle