Selling Diversity: Immigration, Multiculturalism, Employment Equity, and Globalization/The House of Difference: Cultural Politics and National Identity in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Yasmeen Abu-Laban and Christina Gabriel, Selling Diversity: Immigration, Multiculturalism, Employment Equity, and Globalization (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2002), 202pp. Paper. £12.99. ISBN 1-5511-1398-8. Eva Mackey, The House of Difference: Cultural Politics and National Identity in Canada (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002), xxii + 199pp. Paper. £14. ISBN 0-8020-8481-8. Canadian society has changed considerably in recent years, due most importantly to globalisation and neo-liberalism. The 2001 census revealed that Canada is one of the most racially and ethnically diverse countries in the world. This is partly due to the increased migration flows associated with globalisation, but also to state policies relating to diversity. Thus, while many argue that globalisation and neo-liberalism threaten Canadian sovereignty, ironically they might simultaneously be contributing to a more concrete understanding of, and sense of attachment to, the Canadian identity. As many now recognise and argue, diversity is at the core of this identity. Public opinion polls show that Canadians are proud of this sense of diversity, for it reflects admirable qualities: tolerant, accepting, and caring. They argue that Canadians have a long history of embracing diversity, from First Nations to francophone Canadians to the latest wave of 'new Canadians'. Members of the political class repeatedly refer to such values. Diversity is a key part of the federal government's articulation of 'Brand Canada' and 'the Canadian Way'. However, when you probe such attitudes and expressions, a growing sense of discomfort emerges. For example, despite the Prime Minister's proclamations, the Chretien government introduced radical changes to the Indian Act, changes rejected by most Aboriginal Canadians. Post-9/11 initiatives, such as a national identity card for landed immigrants, have also made many Canadians uncomfortable. There are ongoing concerns about institutional racism in the police and judicial systems, and there is considerable evidence that racial minorities suffer from what the Canadian Race Relations Foundation calls 'hidden discrimination' in employment and income, this despite the higher education levels of recent immigrants. Similarly, public opinion polls reveal considerable 'hard line' attitudes on a variety of issues: immigration (especially its racial and ethnic dimension), racial profiling, the rights of Aboriginal peoples, and official bilingualism. It is clear that the daily experiences of many Canadians do not reflect the hype, goodwill or pride articulated by Canadians and their governments. These two excellent books help us understand how diversity has become central to the rearticulation of Canadian nationalism and add to our understanding of these complex issues. As such, they are contributing to a new critical lens for understanding Canada. They tackle similar themes and issues, offering comprehensive overviews of how Canadians and their governments use diversity in the framing of Canadian nationalism and identity. Both books clearly show that the practice of diversity is not nearly as noble as the expression of the positive values linked with diversity. Mackey's examination of the construction of the Canadian national identity rests on what she calls 'the myth of tolerance'. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,010 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,025 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,014 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».