Children With Cochlear Implants Recognize Their Mother's Voice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In Brief Objectives: The available research indicates that cochlear implant (CI) users have difficulty in differentiating talkers, especially those of the same gender. The goal of this study was to determine whether child CI users could differentiate talkers under favorable stimulus and task conditions. We predicted that the use of a highly familiar voice, full sentences, and a game-like task with feedback would lead to higher performance levels than those achieved in previous studies of talker identification in CI users. Design: In experiment 1, 21 CI users aged 4.8 to 14.3 yrs and 16 normal-hearing (NH) 5-yr-old children were required to differentiate their mother's scripted utterances from those of an unfamiliar man, woman, and girl in a four-alternative forced-choice task with feedback. In one condition, the utterances incorporated natural prosodic variations. In another condition, nonmaternal talkers imitated the prosody of each maternal utterance. In experiment 2, 19 of the child CI users and 11 of the NH children from experiment 1 returned on a subsequent occasion to participate in a task that required them to differentiate their mother's utterances from those of unfamiliar women in a two-alternative forced-choice task with feedback. Again, one condition had natural prosodic variations and another had maternal imitations. Results: Child CI users in experiment 1 succeeded in differentiating their mother's utterances from those of a man, woman, and girl. Their performance was poorer than the performance of younger NH children, which was at ceiling. Child CI users' performance was better in the context of natural prosodic variations than in the context of imitations of maternal prosody. Child CI users in experiment 2 differentiated their mother's utterances from that of other women, and they also performed better on naturally varying samples than on imitations. Conclusions: We attribute child CI users' success on talker differentiation, even on same-gender differentiation, to their use of two types of temporal cues: variations in consonant and vowel articulation and variations in speaking rate. Moreover, we contend that child CI users' differentiation of speakers was facilitated by long-term familiarity with their mother's voice. We assessed child implant users' ability to differentiate their mother's voice from the voices of unfamiliar speakers. In Experiment 1 they succeeded in differentiating their other's scripted utterances from those of a man, woman, and girl although their performance was poorer than that of younger children with normal hearing. Child implant users performed better for natural variations in speaking style than for imitations of the maternal style. In Experiment 2 child implant users differentiated their mother's utterances from those of other women, and they performed better on naturally varying samples than on imitations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».