MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1973117661 · doi:10.1353/utq.0.0336

The Dramatic Imagination of Robert Browning: A Literary Life (review)

2009· article· en· W1973117661 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
John Maynard

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican and British Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBiographyVirtueAppealGriffinArt historyLiteratureHistoryArtPhilosophyClassicsLawTheologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Dramatic Imagination of Robert Browning: A Literary Life John Maynard (bio) Richard S. Kennedy and Donald S. Hair. The Dramatic Imagination of Robert Browning: A Literary Life. University of Missouri Press. xvi, 492. US$49.95 There is reason to note well the publication of a new full-length biography of Robert Browning. He continues in this century to be, along with Hopkins and now Christina Rossetti, the Victorian poet who finds most adherents, granted always the magnificence of Tennyson’s canon. And Browning and the Brownings’ biography continues to have a special appeal. Richard S. Kennedy and Donald S. Hair offer an attractive and well-researched life in five hundred pages. Obviously, an Edel-sized biography would give much more detail and take many volumes, and there would be virtue in such a work, as Robert came to know just about everyone of literary or artistic importance during his relatively long life, so his life could cut a cross-section of his times at each stage. This is not what the two authors have attempted. But, especially in the life up through 1855, as prepared by Kennedy before his death, this is a fully researched study that updates a prior major biography, that of William Irvine and Park Honan. (It is a sad fact of mortality, noted by Hair in his gracious introduction, that three attempts at full and authoritative biographies, adding that of W. Hall Griffin and H.C. Minchin to these two, should have required second authors to finish the job.) Kennedy spent many years researching his work; what he has added especially to earlier full studies has been information from the major monuments of Browning scholarship of the later half of the twentieth century, The Brownings’ Correspondence and The Browning Collections, the first still in progress under Philip Kelley and Scott Lewis, the second completed by Kelley and Betty Coley. They have allowed the authors to fill in a great deal of information not previously available, and Hair has had the advantage of work by William Peterson and Michael Meredith on Robert’s connections with F.J. Furnivall and Katharine de Kay Bronson. I see that my own study of Browning’s youth, and a number of other special studies, also aided Kennedy’s work. The authors give us a well-shaped and often quite lively account of Robert’s interesting life. I note as especially attractive to the general reader the accounts of Robert’s attempts to become a dramatist, the stories of his courting of Italy in two earlier trips, before the marriage to Elizabeth and resettlement in Italy brought consummation to his love for that culture and history. The courtship is well shaped to interest us, despite its being such a twice-told tale; Kennedy wisely introduces the reader to aspects of Elizabeth Barrett’s complicated life in order of Robert’s own romance: falling in love, complications, worse complications. Hair’s account is more schematic and brief, but well organized. Hair quotes Dante Gabriel Rossetti marvelling at the discrepancy [End Page 311] between their lives – ‘those two small people’ – and their very large impact on poetry. It is this literary biography, as their title indicates, that especially occupies the authors. One would look in vain for new kinds of biography here, neither thick study of the culture and sociology of the poet, nor deep insight into psychology and motivation, or even a broad view of Robert’s place in the development of ideas of literature. Much information that could contribute to these subjects is made available, but both authors’ focus is on the literary career and poetic achievement. Kennedy, who, pace Pound, would trade the short poems of Dramatic Lyrics for ‘a hundred Sordellos,’ especially focuses on the variety of what he terms monodramas among Robert’s short poems: I doubt his terms will replace the universally used dramatic monologue, but his accounts are rich in appreciation of Robert’s abundant generic playfulness and dramatic inventiveness. Hair, who previously contributed an excellent book on Browning and genre, continues this critical appreciation and adds to it enthusiasm, still too rare, for the abundant Browning beyond The Ring and the Book...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,025

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,005
Tête enseignante GPT0,182
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetAmerican and British Literature Analysis→Travaux en français237 207→