MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1973127481 · doi:10.1086/ahr.110.3.842

:Crafting the Republic: Lima's Artisans and Nation Building in Peru, 1821–1879

2005· article· en· W1973127481 sur OpenAlexaff
Peter Blanchard

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Historical Review · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Studies in Latin America
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndependence (probability theory)ColonialismGarciaPoliticsEconomic historyPolitical scienceCapital (architecture)LegislationLawEconomic growthEconomyHistoryHumanitiesAncient historyEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Iñigo García-Bryce has examined Lima's artisans during the years between José de San Martín's declaration of Peruvian independence and the outbreak of warfare with Chile in 1879. Over that period the number of artisans in Peru's capital multiplied, until by 1876 they made up five percent of the city's 100,000 inhabitants. Simultaneously their influence grew, indicated by the widening range of their activities and by the attention that they attracted from various sectors, including the emerging political parties that sought their support. Their recognition as an influential and productive sector of society was tied to their gradual acceptance of the liberal program that came to dominate Peru during these years. In the author's words, they embraced the “language of liberal republicanism” (p. 5), which opened doors as they assisted in building the new nation. The artisans' route to acceptance and respectability was a rocky one that involved several changes in direction over the years. García-Bryce traces their history, beginning in the colonial period when their interests were defended by guilds and religious brotherhoods. That privileged position came under attack in the eighteenth century as the Bourbon reformers sought to impose centralization. Nevertheless, their organizations managed to survive both this and the subsequent disruptions of the independence struggles, after which they sought to maintain their position by establishing ties with the new nation's ruling strongmen or caudillos. In return for legislation that protected them from foreign competition, they provided military recruits and taxes. That protectionism, however, disappeared with the end of caudillismo at mid-century, forcing the artisans to adopt new strategies, such as switching from guild-based pressure to a broader group pressure, and even taking matters into their own hands. In 1858, carpenters resorted to public demonstrations to protest against the importation of foreign construction materials. Actions such as these indicated a residual commitment to colonial exclusivity, but a shift in thinking was becoming increasingly apparent as the artisans realized that they needed to move with the times and adapt to new ideas if they were to have any real influence. Their acceptance of liberal goals was evident in the artisan schools that were set up to assist in the creation of a moral and productive citizenry. The growing “importance of labor as a central value in the liberal nation” (p. 94) was also evident in the Expositions of 1869 and 1872 that lauded the productivity and accomplishments of local artisans. The appearance of mutual aid societies in the 1860s gave further proof of artisans' adoption of the liberal program, although not in its entirety, for in establishing such societies they rejected the strict liberal picture of the individual as the basis of society. These societies also provided a route to political activity, even if formal political involvement was prohibited. The publication in the 1870s of two short-lived newspapers, El Artesano and El Obrero, gave further evidence of artisans' desire to participate, as well as indicating some of the contradictions within the group. They used the papers to claim leadership of the working class and in doing so even adopted the language of class; yet, they avoided radicalism of any sort in order to maintain the positive impression that they were trying to create.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,929
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,994

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,342
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Historical ReviewMême sujetHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaTravaux en français237 207