MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1973578243 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.98.6.1137

Evaluation of the Role of Sulfidation in Deposition of Gold, Screamer Section of the Betze-Post Carlin-Type Deposit, Nevada

2003· article· en· W1973578243 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEconomic Geology · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésSection (typography)ArchaeologyGeologyHistoryLibrary scienceComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research Article| September 01, 2003 Evaluation of the Role of Sulfidation in Deposition of Gold, Screamer Section of the Betze-Post Carlin-Type Deposit, Nevada Stephen E. Kesler; Stephen E. Kesler Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 †Corresponding author: email, skesler@umich.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar John Fortuna; John Fortuna Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Zaojun Ye; Zaojun Ye Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jeffrey C. Alt; Jeffrey C. Alt Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Daniel P. Core; Daniel P. Core Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Pamela Zohar; Pamela Zohar Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc., P.O. Box 29, Elko, Nevada 89803 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Jeff Borhauer; Jeff Borhauer Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc., P.O. Box 29, Elko, Nevada 89803 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Stephen L. Chryssoulis Stephen L. Chryssoulis Advanced Mineral Technology Laboratory (AMTEL), 100 Collip Circle, UWO Research Park, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Stephen E. Kesler Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 John Fortuna Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Zaojun Ye Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Jeffrey C. Alt Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Daniel P. Core Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 Pamela Zohar Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc., P.O. Box 29, Elko, Nevada 89803 Jeff Borhauer Barrick Goldstrike Mines, Inc., P.O. Box 29, Elko, Nevada 89803 Stephen L. Chryssoulis Advanced Mineral Technology Laboratory (AMTEL), 100 Collip Circle, UWO Research Park, London, Ontario, Canada N6G 4X8 †Corresponding author: email, skesler@umich.edu Publisher: Society of Economic Geologists First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1554-0774 Print ISSN: 0361-0128 Economic Geology Economic Geology (2003) 98 (6): 1137–1157. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.98.6.1137 Article history First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Stephen E. Kesler, John Fortuna, Zaojun Ye, Jeffrey C. Alt, Daniel P. Core, Pamela Zohar, Jeff Borhauer, Stephen L. Chryssoulis; Evaluation of the Role of Sulfidation in Deposition of Gold, Screamer Section of the Betze-Post Carlin-Type Deposit, Nevada. Economic Geology 2003;; 98 (6): 1137–1157. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.98.6.1137 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyEconomic Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract This study was undertaken to evaluate the relation between sulfidation and gold deposition in the Screamer section of the Betze-Post Carlin-type deposit. We also attempted to determine the source of sulfur in the deposit and the possibility that more than one gold-depositing event contributed metal to the Screamer system. Gold ore at Screamer forms a generally stratiform body hosted largely by the Wispy member of the Devonian Popovich Formation and lacks obvious alteration of wall-rock gangue minerals. Gold at Screamer is hosted by arsenian pyrite that forms disseminated grains and overgrowths on diagenetic pyrite. A strong correlation is observed between the gold content of rock samples and their proportion of ore-related (arsenian) pyrite, as determined by point counts.Isocon plots show that mineralization at Screamer involved addition of both sulfur and iron, along with gold, arsenic, antimony, tungsten, and local silica, barium, and phosphorus. Fe/Al vs. S/Al plots show that most ore samples at Screamer do not contain enough sulfur to account for all of their iron as pyrite; petrographic examination shows that the iron occurs in pyrite, ferroan dolomite, and iron-bearing micas in order of decreasing abundance. The Fe/Al vs. S/Al plots also show that Screamer samples with high gold contents contain more pyrite than samples with low gold contents and that samples inside the ore zone have more pyrite than those in the surrounding area. These relations are interpreted to indicate that Screamer has undergone at least two pyrite-forming events. The first event, which probably took place during diagenesis, involved incomplete sulfidation that left some iron in carbonate and silicate minerals. The second event, which probably took place during gold mineralization, sulfidized most remaining iron and added pyrite in the Screamer ore zone.The δ34S values of chemically extracted sulfur from disseminated pyrite at Screamer range from –13.8 to 16.5 per mil, and δ34S values for hand-picked separates of pyrite and other sulfides in veins cutting these rocks range from –21.2 to 11.7 per mil. A significant fraction of samples with high gold contents and of samples in the ore zone regardless of gold content have δ34S values between –1 and 5 per mil. These data suggest that early diagenetic sulfur with a wide range of δ34S values was overprinted by sulfur with isotopic compositions in the –1 to 5 per mil range that was associated with gold mineralization. The δ34S values for gold-related sulfur at Screamer are lower than those reported for bulk mineral separates from most other Carlin-type deposits and from SIMS analyses of sulfides from the proximal Post part of the Betze-Post system and could be magmatic. Limited evidence can be found for multiple gold-forming events in the Screamer zone. Tungsten, which might have been introduced by the Jurassic-age Goldstrike stock, is widespread in the deposit and correlates closely with gold. A few samples with high tungsten/gold ratios found along fault zones might be part of an earlier phase of mineralization related to the Goldstrike stock. A δ34S value for pyrite in one of these samples is similar to the high values reported for sulfides in auriferous, polymetallic mineralization in the Post section of the deposit, but this mineralization is not reported to contain tungsten. Other veins containing sphalerite have lower δ34S values and lack consistent gold values.Whereas there is no correlation between gold values and the degree to which the host rocks have undergone sulfidation, there is a strong and highly significant correlation between gold values and the abundance of ore-related pyrite. This shows that simple sulfidation of immediately adjacent wall rock cannot account alone for gold deposition at Screamer and it might not be the only ore-depositing process in some other Carlin deposits. A more general, "extended sulfidation" process could be important, however. One likely process involves mixing of an invading, mineralizing fluid containing sulfur and gold with a wall-rock fluid containing iron derived from adjacent or distal wall rocks. Recognition of the source(s) for this iron and fluid flow pathways responsible for introducing it to the ore zone could provide useful guidance in exploration for the next Carlin trend. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,354
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,216

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,199 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle