MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1973667862 · doi:10.1353/gsp.2011.0076

<i>Hitler's Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State</i> (review)

2008· article· en· W1973667862 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wendy C. Hamblet

Notice bibliographique

RevueGenocide Studies and Prevention · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGenocideNazismThe HolocaustSociologyPoliticsWritLawIdeologyScholarshipWorld War IIState (computer science)HistoryReligious studiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Book Review Götz Aly, Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, trans. Jefferson Chase. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2007. Pp. 332. $32.50 US. Reviewed by Wendy C. Hamblet, Department of University Studies, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro Every so often, in the broad history of the human world, a madman comes along with a plan for a ‘‘New World Order’’ that includes the targeted mass killing of fellow human beings. This is no great surprise in a world so broad and humanly diverse. The mystery most compelling to genocide scholars is: Why do so many ‘‘ordinary people’’ support their leader’s genocidal project? In the case of the Holocaust, decades of scholarship have produced a spectrum of historical, psychological, and sociological theories to address this mystery. Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem argues for the ‘‘banality of evil’’ among citizens under the power of a totalitarian political regime. Daniel Goldhagen’s Hitler’s Willing Executioners posits a peculiarly virulent form of anti-Semitism universally shared by ordinary Germans of the early twentieth century. Christopher Browning’s more nuanced Ordinary Men, a major research source for Goldhagen’s book, argues against the notion of a uniquely Germanic evil; Browning’s interviews of hundreds of Nazi executioners demonstrate instead that ‘‘ordinary’’ Germans became killers through peculiar historical circumstances and ideological indoctrination, but also because of dangerously common human values such as loyalty to the battalion, a sense of duty, and national pride.1 This argument has proved central to scholarly debates about genocides in general. But the debate takes a fresh twist with Götz Aly’s Hitler’s Beneficiaries. Aly writes to challenge current Holocaust scholarship, which in its latest phase targets German industrialist elites with complicity in Nazi barbarisms. While Aly acknowledges the role of German bourgeois elites in Nazi murder projects, he sees the recent debate as a problematic shift of the burden of blame from the German population at large to a handful of individuals. This shift, he argues, redirects public attention from a pivotal driving factor of the Holocaust—‘‘the potential advantages everyday Germans derived from the Nazi regime’’ (2). The Nazis were not only racist, Aly argues, but classist as well. The welfare of the common people (Volk) was a primary consideration in determining Nazi policy. From the start of the regime’s power, the commoners’ needs were prioritized and their lot economically improved, first through an efficient campaign to eradicate unemployment and then, throughout the war, by incurring an irresponsible level of state debt that was balanced by political and economic violence in occupied territories. Ultimately the Nazis plundered their European neighbors, crippled the economies of the nations they conquered, and starved local populations so that these countries, rather than the German populace, could be made to bear the economic burden of Hitler’s war. In short, Aly argues, racist ideology (Goldhagen’s argument), political realism (Arendt’s ‘‘banality of evil’’ in a totalitarian regime), and historical forces and Wendy C. Hamblet, review of Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State by Götz Aly. Genocide Studies and Prevention 3, 2 (August 2008): 267–268. ß 2008 Genocide Studies and Prevention. doi:10.3138/gsp.3.2.267 bureaucratic standards of compliance (Browning’s Theory) were not the only, or even the primary, motivating factors that drove ordinary Germans to tolerate Nazi racist ideology and to condone and even participate in the murderous acts undertaken during the Third Reich. Rather, Hitler’s pragmatic program of redistributing the plunder of genocide and war to the underprivileged classes convinced the ‘‘ordinary’’ German people that the Nazi leadership had the good of the Volk at heart both in its grandest designs for world domination and in its least pleasant homicidal duties. Wartime expenditures of Hitler’s advancing Volkstaat may have reached dizzying proportions— and Aly documents in the finest detail each phase of the regime’s financial suicide— but the economic care the Nazis extended to the ordinary German Volk of ‘‘proper racial pedigree’’ convinced the people that Germany was headed toward a great and glorious future, a new Volkisch age, directly promoting their material interests. Aly’s stark...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,786
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,266 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGenocide Studies and PreventionMême sujetItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyTravaux en français237 207