MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1974078441 · doi:10.1353/utq.2006.0169

Love, Hate, and Fear in Canada's Cold War (review)

2006· article· en· W1974078441 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nicholas J. Mount

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCold warPoliticsPower (physics)Media studiesHistorySociologyLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Love, Hate, and Fear in Canada's Cold War Nick Mount (bio) Richard Cavell , editor. Love, Hate, and Fear in Canada's Cold War Green College Thematic Lecture Series. University of Toronto Press. viii, 216. $50.00, 24.95 Love, Hate, and Fear in Canada's Cold War is a rare reminder that with a focused topic, qualified contributors, and a principled editor, conference proceedings can make good books. Beginning as lectures at the University of British Columbia, this third volume in the Green College Thematic Lecture Series focuses not on the Cold War we thought we knew, the international chess game of superpowers, but on the cultural campaign within a lesser power's borders against enemies real, imagined, and grossly exaggerated. It's a book not about what they did, but about what we did, [End Page 438] and to whom. From its revisionist perspective, Canada's Cold War was less about the 'Red scare' than about protecting the Canadian identity from its most powerful ally and from many of its own least powerful citizens. As editor Richard Cavell says in his introduction, ours was a Cold War fought 'for nothing less than control of national self-representation.' Director of the University of British Columbia's International Canadian Studies Centre, Cavell has brought together a select group of established scholars from history, sociology, literature, film studies, political science, and sexuality studies to explore various fronts of this cultural war. Among the eight essays selected for publication from the original series are learned overviews like Reg Whitaker's summary of American influences on Canadian defence and security policy during and after the Cold War, and Valerie Korinek's analysis of Canadian women's attitudes towards the Cold War through the pages of Chatelaine. There are also more specific Cold War stories, such as Steve Hewitt's account of RCMP surveillance of the Unitarian and United Churches for suspected Communist sympathies, or Gary Kinsman's story of Canada's war on queers, the over nine thousand 'suspected,' 'alleged,' and 'confirmed' homosexuals investigated by the RCMP because of their supposed susceptibility to Communist blackmail. The dominant themes in these and the other contributions include Canadian attempts to monitor and regulate 'deviant' sexual behaviour because of its supposed association with 'deviant' politics, and the recurring argument that as a cultural discourse, Canada's Cold War began well before the Gouzenko affair and survived the collapse of the Berlin Wall to affect present Canadian attitudes towards immigration, security, and the Other. American influence on Canada's Cold War is less a theme than a constant presence, both historically and in the book's own assertions of the uniquely Canadian origins and flavour of Canada's Cold War. As Cavell puts this argument, 'To state that Canada's Cold War was "culturally" produced is to assert, broadly, that it was not a "natural" outgrowth of our contiguity with the United States or of our European ties, but that it was actively produced here and not just passively received from somewhere else - its roots lying deep in the historical substrata of the nation.' My only complaint with Love, Hate, and Fear in Canada's Cold War is perversely enough its greatest strength, its focus. The essays in this collection are united not just in their topic, but also in their politics and their methods, Marx reigning distantly over the one and Foucault more closely over the other. The application of the same method from the same political stance tends to produce the same conclusions, which is precisely and laudably what gives the collection its thematic unity. But it also obscures other approaches to the subject, among them the 'more conventional accounts' of Canada's Cold War occasionally referred to in introductory paragraphs and footnotes. Myself, I would have liked to have heard herein from those more conventional accounts, to hear what they might say [End Page 439] about, for instance, Kinsman's attempt to 'disrupt and decentre the master-narrative of heterosexual Cold War Canadian history.' But since those accounts are readily available between other covers, Love, Hate, and Fear needs only to be read with the caution that it is not an introduction...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,375
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,754

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,009
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,167
Écart entre enseignants0,163 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→