Infliximab induced liver injury in Crohn's disease: A challenging diagnosis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dear Sir, A 24-year-old male patient with a 6-year history of Crohn's disease (A2L1B2, Montreal classification),1 in remission for 4 years with mesalazine, was admitted in September 2010 complaining of abdominal pain and cramps. Physical examination revealed slight and diffuse abdominal pain. Entero-magnetic resonance revealed terminal ileitis and, thus, budesonide (9 mg/day) and azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg/day) were started. Nevertheless, the patient presented 12% of weight loss in 7 months. In April 2011, abdominal ultrasound showed persistent bowel loop wall thickening. Infliximab 5 mg/kg was added to azathioprine in May 2011 and the patient became rapidly asymptomatic, presenting 10 kg weight gain. However, since the second infliximab infusion, liver tests raised: ALP 388 U/L (NR: 38–126 U/L), GGT 339 U/L (NR: 12–58 U/L), AST 167 U/L (NR: 15–46 U/L), ALT 211 U/L (NR: 13–69 U/L). Azathioprine was interrupted in October 2011. Serological tests for hepatitis A, B and C, cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus and herpes simplex virus were negative. Liver autoimmunity and metabolic study, abdominal ecodoppler, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were all normal. A liver biopsy revealed slight, chronic hepatitis and cholestasis. Considering the exclusion of main liver diseases (such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, autoimmune hepatitis, reactive hepatitis, hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma, viral hepatitis reactivation, cirrhosis), the temporal correlation between infliximab exposure and laboratorial changes, along with a CIOMS/RUCAM score of 8 (reflecting a probable toxic effect of infliximab on the liver),2 an infliximab-induced hepatitis diagnosis was admitted. In December 2011, a switch to adalimumab was made and liver enzyme reached normal values in 8 months (Fig. 1). Several drugs used to treat IBD have been implicated in liver injury, however, relatively few cases of anti-TNF-α induced hepatitis have been reported.3 In this case, IBD related hepatobiliary diseases and malignancy were excluded. Withdrawal of azathioprine was the first option, since this drug is responsible for most of the cases of hepatotoxicity in IBD patients. However, liver enzymes remained elevated. As there was strong evidence of temporal relationship between infliximab exposure and elevation of liver enzymes, a switch to adalimumab was decided, enabling an uneventful recovery. Although rare, there are some case reports of infliximab induced liver injury. Autoimmune phenotype is the most common, but cholestatic pattern has also been reported.4 Polymorphisms in genes encoding proteins related to TNF-α seem to modify pharmacodynamics of anti-TNF-α. This fact may explain different individual response to TNF-α antagonists and also distinct patterns of toxicity and absence of cross-reactivity between these drugs.5 Thus, DILI diagnosis can represent a clinical challenge in IBD patients, as it, following the exclusion of other causes, involves a temporal correlation between drug exposure and appearance of hepatic abnormalities, and its normalization after treatment withdrawal. Conflict of Interest: There are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest. The authors did not receive any funding for this work. Liver tests evolution since infliximab introduction until 8 months after its withdrawal. Abbreviations: TB: total bilirubin; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; GGT: gamma-glutamyltransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,013 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».