Renewed Optimism in Manitoba about Regulatory Change to Expand Scope of Practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Pharmacy regulators and pharmacists in Manitoba are hoping they're nearing the end of a lengthy and sometimes bumpy journey towards a significant expansion of pharmacist authority in the province. If all goes well, revised regulations giving force to legislation passed in 2006 will be approved by Manitoba pharmacists before summer, says Shawn Bugden, president of the regulatory body, the Manitoba Pharmaceutical Association (MPhA). “I think everyone is frustrated at how long it's taking,” says Mr. Bugden. “We have been working hard with our partners in government to craft and revise the regulations document and that has taken a long time.” When the revisions to the Pharmaceutical Act passed in December 2006, the proposed new scope of pharmacy practice made Manitoba one of the leaders in the country. Pharmacists were to be given the authority to immunize, order lab tests, independently prescribe continued care prescriptions, and to prescribe medical devices and a list of medications for some minor ailments. After passage, the next step was to draft a Regulations Policy Document to put before the members, as Manitoba is the one Canadian province that requires pharmacists to vote on regulations. The membership rejected the first version in March 2008; after revisions were made, members voted 84% in favour in November 2010. The final stage of regulation development, in concert with government, proved more complicated than anticipated. More than a year later, the MPhA had organized special meetings of members beginning February 21, 2012, to present and explain the final regulations. However, there have been changes since the 2010 membership vote. “It is now clear that the regulations in their final legal form will require a ratification vote by the membership,” says Mr. Bugden, noting that while many of the revisions are “subtle,” others are substantial enough to require another vote on the package. The Manitoba Society of Pharmacists (MSP) has expressed frustration over the lengthy process over the past 15 months but is pleased with the latest developments. “I would like to say we are positive and more optimistic than we have been in a while. And we are prepared to put our best effort into seeing the regulations move forward,” says Mel Baxter, president of MSP's board of directors and a community pharmacy manager in Morris. “But this includes keeping in mind that there was a reason for the regulations being rejected in 2007 and we need to see and analyze the latest revisions before taking a position on whether the membership will support them.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,027 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,014 | 0,022 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».