MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1974713468 · doi:10.1097/00001888-200105000-00075

Melding the Family Medicine and General Internal Medicine Rotations into an Ambulatory Clerkship

2001· article· en· W1974713468 sur OpenAlexaff
KIMBERLY A. CROOKS, Richard P. Usatine, Thomas J. Mattimore

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInnovations in Medical Education
Établissements canadiensKimberly-Clark (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCurriculumMedicineMedical educationAmbulatoryAmbulatory careClinical clerkshipFamily medicinePsychologyInternal medicineHealth carePedagogy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objective: A significant overlap exists between the work done by general internists and that done by family physicians in the ambulatory care setting. Consequently, the curriculum committee at the University of California, Los Angeles, UCLA School of Medicine decided to join the two clinical experiences in order to promote interdisciplinary teaching and learning. UCLA has developed and implemented a curriculum for combining the family medicine clerkship and the outpatient portion of the internal medicine clerkship. The new format streamlines teaching obligations in ambulatory sites while standardizing the curriculum with weekly, shared didactic instruction on campus. Description: UCLA is in the midst of a significant curricular revision for the clinical years. All third-year clerkships have been modified to incorporate a greater proportion of case-based instruction and to concentrate on particular aspects of the physical examination in 2000–01. The ambulatory education merge began with a needs assessment that identified topics taught by the respective curricula to eliminate duplication and ascertain areas not addressed. The outcome is a combined ambulatory didactic curriculum, offered as a continuum for one eight-week clerkship. Teaching responsibilities for the new shared sessions were assigned based on departmental strengths and constructed to emphasize the clinical needs of the ambulatory setting, particularly the ability to function in this time-constrained atmosphere. New case-based instruction was developed in geriatrics, cardiology, and musculoskeletal exam skills (using patients with rheumatologic diseases), and for diabetes and hypertension. These additions supplemented existing instruction modules that students had enjoyed in dermatology (using Web-based cases), prevention, contraception, nutrition, and complementary medicine. The majority of instruction has shifted to small-group format; faculty lacking experience in this teaching approach have received individual faculty development. The students begin with a single orientation for the eight-week clerkship, with an introduction to the focused workup in the outpatient setting. The faculty give individual feedback while observing the students' skills with standardized patients. Overviews of family medicine and general internal medicine as disciplines are presented, and logistic information is given. The clinical portions of both clerkships remain intact, as the students spend four weeks at either the family medicine or the internal medicine site, followed by four weeks at the opposite site. Returning to UCLA each Friday for these shared sessions, the students participate in group activities, lectures, demonstrations, patient interviews and examinations, and a review of informatics and the use of the computer for presentations. Every student is required to complete a case write-up or do a PowerPoint presentation before his or her peers, based on a patient seen during the rotation. A single combined exam with questions covering basic principles in each discipline closes the rotation. A grade for each specialty is generated based upon the student's clinical performance, the final paper or presentation, and the portion of the exam devoted to that specialty Discussion: This format allows the clinical experiences in each discipline to remain distinct, thus permitting each specialty to retain its own identity. The ambulatory clerkship is viewed as a work in progress during this inaugural year as our course-evaluation process continues to prompt modifications. The students consistently rate sessions with handson learning activities and small-group sessions highly. The next goal is to develop an on-line examination.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,084

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0250,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,084
Tête enseignante GPT0,421
Écart entre enseignants0,338 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic Medicine→Même sujetInnovations in Medical Education→Travaux en français237 207→