Notice bibliographique
Résumé
“The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown”Howard Phillips Lovecraft Coping with, and trying to understand, emerging epidemics has been part of the human experience since time immemorial. The concern that attends the emergence of a novel infectious disease might be substantial, but fears often subside as the disease becomes better understood, partly because initial findings tend to be biased towards cases and case clusters with more severe outcomes.1Presanis AM De Angelis D et al.New York City Swine Flu Investigation TeamThe severity of pandemic H1N1 influenza in the United States, from April to July 2009: a Bayesian analysis.PLoS Med. 2009; 6: e1000207Crossref PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar, 2Yu H Cowling BJ Feng L et al.Human infection with avian influenza A H7N9 virus: an assessment of clinical severity.Lancet. 2013; 382: 138-145Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (216) Google Scholar, 3Penttinen P Kaasik-Aaslav K Friaux A et al.Taking stock of the first 133 MERS coronavirus cases globally—Is the epidemic changing?.Euro Surveill. 2013; 18: 20596Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Epidemiologists and microbiologists are currently working to better characterise the outbreak of Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus infection that made its initial appearance in a health-care-based outbreak in Jordan in 2012.4European Centre for Disease Prevention and ControlSevere respiratory disease associated with Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Updated rapid risk assessment, 7th update. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm2013http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/RRA_MERS-CoV_7th_update.pdfGoogle Scholar The understanding of the natural history and epidemiology of an emerging infectious disease allows us to predict its behaviour and identify control strategies. In The Lancet Infectious Diseases, the study by Simon Cauchemez and colleagues5Cauchemez S Fraser C Van Kerkhove MD et al.Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: quantification of the extent of the epidemic, surveillance biases, and transmissibility.Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; (published online Nov 13.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70304-9PubMed Google Scholar is timely and important, since it provides us with such information about the emerging MERS outbreak. We were impressed by the extent to which Cauchemez and co-authors did their analyses using limited publicly available data. Whereas decision makers often ask infectious disease modellers to provide an epidemiological crystal ball that shows what will happen, these investigators use modelling more appropriately, as a method for the quantification and management of uncertainty. What does their analysis tell us? A key epidemiological parameter early in an emerging epidemic is the basic reproductive number (R0), which describes the average number of new cases of infection generated by one primary case in a susceptible population.6Fisman T Pandemic Influenza Outbreak Research Modelling TeamModelling an influenza pandemic: a guide for the perplexed.CMAJ. 2009; 181: 171-173Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar R0 affects the growth rate of an outbreak and the total number of people infected by the end of the outbreak. When R0 is lower than 1, a sustained epidemic will not occur. Using epidemiological and genetic data, the authors estimated that R0 was small (consistent with earlier estimates),7Breban R Riou J Fontanet A Interhuman transmissibility of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: estimation of pandemic risk.Lancet. 2013; 382: 694-699Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (299) Google Scholar, 8ProMED Mail, PRO/AH/EDR> MERS-CoV - Eastern Mediterranean (11): Saudi Arabia, new death. [4] Transmissibility and cluster sizes. ProMED-mail 2013; May 27: 20130527.1738597. http://www.promedmail.org. (accessed Sept 7, 2013).Google Scholar but might be slightly greater than 1. However, R0 estimates based on disease cluster sizes were lower than 1, suggesting that cluster identification leads to application of successful control measures. Using data on MERS-infected travellers returning from the Middle East, the investigators estimated MERS incidence, and back-calculated the likely extent of case underreporting; they estimated that most cases have been undetected. These findings suggest that mildly symptomatic cases are common, with implications for the effectiveness of infection control measures. They also show us that the MERS outbreak represents a dynamic process, with human incidence possibly portraying transmission from animal to man occurring in the context of an as yet unconfirmed epizootic. The distance between the raw, publicly available, epidemiological and virological data obtained by the authors, and the insights provided by them in their report can represent the distance between abundant information and actionable knowledge. The quality of data available to these authors is poor, but should that have prevented them from proceeding with analysis until better data were available? We do not think so: inferences based on the best available data, even if those data are imperfect, allow decision makers to follow optimum courses of action based on what is known at a given point in time. Could the estimates presented here be refined if more complete data were to become available? Undoubtedly, and it seems likely that these investigators and others will continue to do so as this disease is further studied. The widespread, transparent, and trans-jurisdictional sharing of epidemiological data in the context of public health emergencies could improve the accuracy of early efforts at epidemiological synthesis, such as those presented here by Cauchemez and colleagues.5Cauchemez S Fraser C Van Kerkhove MD et al.Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: quantification of the extent of the epidemic, surveillance biases, and transmissibility.Lancet Infect Dis. 2013; (published online Nov 13.)http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70304-9PubMed Google Scholar However, many disincentives for such sharing by jurisdictions experiencing outbreaks remain, including lost travel and tourism, concerns about data security, and interest in scientific publication. Creative epidemiologists and computer scientists have shown various means to infer levels of disease activity with indirect Internet data mining techniques.9Brownstein JS Freifeld CC HealthMap: the development of automated real-time internet surveillance for epidemic intelligence.Euro Surveill. 2007; 12: E0711295Google Scholar, 10St Louis C Zorlu G Can Twitter predict disease outbreaks?.BMJ. 2012; 344: e2353Crossref PubMed Scopus (82) Google Scholar, 11Ginsberg J Mohebbi MH Patel RS Brammer L Smolinski MS Brilliant L Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.Nature. 2009; 457: 1012-1014Crossref PubMed Scopus (3113) Google Scholar The ability to draw inferences about diseases from non-traditional data sources will hopefully both provide alternate means of characterising epidemics, and diminish the temptation towards non-transparency in traditional public health authorities. The resultant improvements in rapid epidemiological risk estimates would benefit all of us. We declare that we have no conflicts of interest. Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: quantification of the extent of the epidemic, surveillance biases, and transmissibilityBy showing that a slowly growing epidemic is underway either in human beings or in an animal reservoir, quantification of uncertainty in transmissibility estimates, and provision of the first estimates of the scale of the epidemic and extent of case detection biases, we provide valuable information for more informed risk assessment. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».