The Risk of Meningococcal Disease in Travelers and Current Recommendations for Prevention
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the economic recovery gaining momentum, travel experts predict that tourism in all regions will increase in 2010 by an estimated 3% to 4%. 1 This increase in travel is forecasted to exceed 5% in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East, where the risk of acquiring meningococcal disease or becoming a carrier is higher. 2 When evaluating the need for vaccination in travelers, particularly for those traveling to developing world countries, it is important to consider not only the incidence rate but also the impact of the respective infection (Figure 1). 3 As an example, meningococcal disease is rarely reported in travelers, but the impact of this infection can be as devastating for travelers as for any other individual. With its rapid clinical course and narrow window for diagnosis, the potential for negative outcomes from meningococcal disease may be increased particularly in travelers to remote locations where access to adequate health care facilities and antibiotics is limited. There is an additional public health concern with meningococcal infection, as travelers who are carriers may spread the infection in the society back home. Impact and incidence of vaccine‐preventable diseases in travelers to developing countries. 3 PPD = purified protein derivative, a tuberculin test. Outbreaks of meningococcal disease frequently occurred among Hajj pilgrims, their contacts, and thereafter even in persons without known contacts prior to 2002, when authorities of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia issued a quadrivalent meningococcal vaccination requirement to obtain a Hajj visa. 4,5 Otherwise meningococcal disease usually has been considered to be rare among travelers (Figure 2). 6 A single retrospective survey has attempted to quantify the risk of meningococcal disease among international travelers originating in industrialized countries. 7 Health authorities in 56 of 108 contacted countries (51.9%) completed questionnaires concerning reported cases of meningococcal disease, and tourism data were derived from statistics provided by the World Tourism Organization and national tourism authorities for the study period (1986–1989). On the basis of 13 cases imported to 56 countries, a monthly incidence rate of 0.4 per million was extrapolated, which corresponds to approximately 0.4 per 100,000 population per year. 7 When this rate is compared with the commonly quoted annual incidence rate of 0.5 to 10 cases per 100,000 population in industrialized countries, 8,9 it appears that ordinary travel does not result in an increased risk for meningococcal disease. Incidence rate per month of vaccine‐preventable diseases in developing countries—2010. 4 CFR = case fatality rate. As in the general population, infections in travelers can occur in healthy persons without any apparent risk factors and regardless of the type of traveling or the travel destination. In the past few years, a number of anecdotal reports of meningococcal disease among travelers have been published (Table 1). 10–15 An additional six cases, which so far are unpublished, have been detected in the GeoSentinel, a worldwide communication and data collection network for the surveillance of travel‐related morbidity. 16 Among them, two occurred after a visit to Disney World (Pat Schlagenhauf, personal communication). This demonstrates that, among travelers, meningococcal disease may occur in all parts of the world and in various types of travelers—trekkers, leisure and business travelers, students, and pilgrims—and in all age groups. As in the population affected at home, children and young travelers were most frequently affected. Some of the cases of meningococcal disease in travelers reported in recent years confirm what we know from data in other populations: environmental risk is increased by staying in dormitories, 11,15 educational or military institutions, 17,18 and refugee camps 19 and by attending sporting events 20,21 and discotheques. 22 Clusters of meningococcal disease caused by the same strain have occurred in children whose connection was riding the same school bus, 23 which indicates there could be potential for transmission aboard tour buses. Almost 30 years ago during an outbreak situation, six trekkers fell ill in Nepal. 24 The sum of these examples illustrates that the risk of meningococcal disease in travelers can vary based on destination, mode of transport, type of accommodation, and reason for travel/destination activities. While high‐risk groups can be determined primarily on theoretical and general epidemiological considerations, there is no zero risk in any traveler. Anecdotal cases of meningococcal disease in travelers, 1996 to 2008 10–15 Anecdotal cases of meningococcal disease in travelers, 1996 to 2008 10–15 International travelers can also facilitate the global spread of meningococcal disease. Until 2002, this occurred almost annually after the Hajj. However, potentially risks may still occur, as illustrated by a 2009 case of an individual aged 43 years who contracted a fluoroquinolone‐resistant strain of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup A. 12 The patient developed symptoms within 24 hours of returning to Italy after traveling to Delhi and Chennai in India, with a stopover of a few hours in Frankfurt, Germany. Although the patient had no known contact with anyone in India with previous or current meningococcal disease, testing revealed the strain was the same that had caused epidemics in the area in 2005 to 2006. Fortunately, no known secondary cases have been reported in Italy. 12 During epidemics of meningococcal disease in sub‐Saharan Africa, the so‐called African meningitis belt that stretches from Senegal to Ethiopia, as many as 1,000 per 100,000 population may be affected. 25 Recently, the epidemic‐susceptible area has been expanded to Guinea‐Bissau, Guinea, the Ivory Coast, Togo, the Central African Republic, and Eritrea. 8 Countries around the Rift Valley and Great Lakes regions are also now considered to be at risk (Figure 3).26,27 Predicted probability of epidemic experience of meningococcal meningitis. 26 The risk of meningococcal disease in the population in this area is particularly elevated during the dry season between December and June because of dust winds and background upper respiratory tract infections. However, due to the dynamics of climate variability, risk exists somewhat all year. Population displacements, such as when nomads and farmers congregate in traditional market areas, and overcrowded living conditions can increase the risk of transmission and contribute to epidemics of disease. 28 According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in the 2009 epidemic season, 78,416 suspected cases of meningococcal disease, including 4,053 deaths, were reported in 14 African countries implementing enhanced surveillance techniques. 28 This represents the largest number of cases and deaths since the previous large meningococcal disease epidemic in this region in 1996 to 1997, during which >25,000 people died. 25 However, to our knowledge, there has not been a single case published about a traveler having been affected in the African meningitis belt. At the least, to some extent, this may be due to the fact that, following essentially congruent vaccination recommendations, a fair proportion of high‐risk travelers may have been protected appropriately. This may also be, in part, because active surveillance is limited in Africa, Latin America, and Asia, 25 which may result in an underestimation of burden. Finally, an important proportion of travelers has a different behavior and far more social distancing as compared to the local population. During the annual Hajj pilgrimage, >2 million Muslims from across the globe travel to Mecca and Medina. 29 The congregation of such a large population of individuals from such a wide variety of regions, as well as the crowded conditions at the destination, creates a good environment for meningococcal disease transmission, and the international spread of meningococcal disease resulting in outbreaks and epidemics in several countries has been linked to pilgrims returning from the Hajj prior to the institution of current vaccination protocols. 30–33 In 1987, outbreaks in the United States and a large epidemic in Africa of meningococcal serogroup A disease were associated with returning pilgrims. 33,34 More recently, in 2001 to 2002, outbreaks of serogroup W‐135 disease in Europe, the United States, the Middle East, and Asia, as well as a large epidemic in Burkina Faso in Africa, were linked to returning pilgrims. 30–32 One study assessing the risk for meningococcal disease spread as a result of the Hajj‐evaluated N meningitidis carriage in US pilgrims traveling through John F. Kennedy Airport in New York, NY, in February 2001. 31 The prevalence of N meningitidis carriage was higher in those returning from the Hajj (2.6% of 844) than in departing pilgrims (0.9% of 425). Although none of the outbound study participants tested were carriers of serogroup W‐135, nine of those tested inbound were positive for the serogroup (1.3%; p = 0.01). 31 After the 2001 Hajj, a 15% serogroup W‐135 carriage rate also was observed in 171 pilgrims returning to Singapore, with evidence of spread to household contacts. 35 In comparison, data from 2001 indicate that the risk of the international spread of meningococcal disease is much lower for Umrah pilgrimage, which is shorter, occurs all year, and involves much smaller groups of travelers. 29 Fortunately, as a consequence of enforced implementation of the meningococcal vaccine requirements issued by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia health authorities, no exportation of meningococcal disease by Hajj pilgrims has been reported since 2004. There is, however, some concern about serogroup B meningococcal disease for the future. 36 Approximately every 6 weeks, the CDC investigates an incident of possible transmission of meningococcal disease on an aircraft. 37,38 Many other national institutions have similar queries, and passengers have been diagnosed with meningococcal disease after arrival, such as a journalist with serogroup W‐135 in Singapore and an Israeli student in the United States. 9,29 On the other hand, to our knowledge, only two reports of in‐flight transmission have been published. The first occurred on a 14.5‐hour flight from Los Angeles to Sydney. Two individuals who had been sitting 12 rows apart were diagnosed with serogroup B meningococcal disease of the same allelic profile. Both patients were women aged >65 years, and both recovered after treatment with antibiotics. One patient reported walking around the plane with some frequency, whereas the other, seated in an aisle seat, only got up a few times to use the rest room. It remains unknown whether transmission occurred from one passenger to the other or whether a third carrier infected them both. 39 In the second report, one passenger and one crew member were infected on an 11‐hour military charter flight from the Southwestern United States to Frankfurt. One of the individuals had serogroup B disease; the serogroup in the other individual was undetermined. 40 Vaccination against meningococcal disease is not required for individuals traveling into any country except for Hajj and Umrah pilgrims to Saudi Arabia. 5,41 This visa requirement for Saudi Arabia has been extended to all nationals of many countries in tropical Africa arriving by air. 42 Proof of immunization is needed for all Hajj and Umrah visa applicants of all ages; depending on the age group and origin, other vaccinations may also be required (yellow fever, poliomyelitis, and influenza). 5 Applicants must have been immunized more than 10 days and less than 3 years before entering Saudi Arabia. 5 Because of this requirement for periodic vaccination, waning immunity due to immunologic hyporesponsiveness after repeat administration of meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines can be a concern. 6 A study on residents of Mecca and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, aged 10 to 29 years found that repeated administration of the AC polysaccharide vaccine resulted in immunologic hyporesponsiveness to serogroup C. 6 Hyporesponsiveness is not a factor with conjugate quadrivalent meningococcal vaccines, 43 and they should therefore be preferred for use for instance in Hajj pilgrims. Several national health authorities as well as the WHO have issued guidance on vaccinating travelers against meningococcal disease based on environmental factors, such as travel destination, time of year, and type of contact with the local population (Table 2). Although not all the recommendations are consistent—especially in terms of the strength of the recommendation—many overlap to some degree, and all recommend vaccination for all travelers visiting destinations with current outbreaks or epidemic situations. Synopsis of meningococcal vaccine recommendations in travelers WHO = World Health Organization; CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CATMAT = Canadian Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel; NaTHNac = National Travel Health Network and Centre; ECTM = Expert Committee for Travel Medicine. Synopsis of meningococcal vaccine recommendations in travelers WHO = World Health Organization; CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CATMAT = Canadian Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel; NaTHNac = National Travel Health Network and Centre; ECTM = Expert Committee for Travel Medicine. In its 2010 edition of International Travel and Health, the WHO lists meningococcal disease vaccination as being of selective use in travelers, along with hepatitis A vaccine, for example. 44 For travelers to industrialized nations, where they may be exposed to sporadic cases of meningococcal disease, WHO cautions that risk is increased in locations where large groups of adolescents and young adults congregate, such as in schools and college dormitories, and recommends considering vaccination for college students. Vaccination should also be considered in “all travelers to countries in the sub‐Saharan meningitis belt.” The risk of infection may be greater in those traveling during the dry season or those staying in the area for longer periods and living with or being in close contact with the local population. 44 Vaccination is also to be considered in “all travelers … to areas with current epidemics.” 44 The WHO, US, UK, and German/Swiss recommendations are very similar (Table 2). Essentially, vaccination is considered or recommended in similar at‐risk groups as those mentioned in the WHO guidance, including travelers to the African meningitis belt and those with prolonged contact with indigenous populations. The UK recommendations also specify meningococcal vaccination for health care workers and travelers visiting friends and relatives due to the close contact these activities involve. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the German/Swiss guidelines explicitly recommend vaccination with a quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine. The preferred vaccine in the United States for individuals aged 2 to 55 years is a glycoconjugate vaccine, with the polysaccharide quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine currently still recommended for those aged >55 years. Children who received either vaccine at age 2 to 6 years who remain at risk should be revaccinated 3 years later with the indicated glycoconjugate quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine, and then every 5 years thereafter. Recommendations are similar for those aged 7 to 55 years who remain at increased risk, except that the period from the initial vaccination to the first revaccination is 5 instead of 3 years. 8 Travelers to or residents of countries where meningococcal disease is hyperendemic or epidemic are one of the groups considered to have prolonged increased risk for meningococcal disease (along with those with increased susceptibility to infection and those with anatomic or functional asplenia). 45 Although the CDC travelers' guidelines do not include a recommendation for college students studying abroad in endemic areas (eg, Europe), general guidelines from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommend all college freshman living in dormitories in the United States who were vaccinated with the quadrivalent polysaccharide vaccine more than 5 years ago be revaccinated with a glycoconjugate quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine. 45 According to the American College Health Association adolescents and young adults account for nearly 30% of all cases of meningitis in the United States. Some 100 to 125 cases of meningococcal disease occur on college campuses each year, and 5 to 15 students will die as a result. Evidence shows 70% to 80% of cases in the college age group are caused by serogroup C, W‐135, or Y, which are potentially vaccine preventable. 46 One could extrapolate that this recommendation would hold whether the student was entering college in the United States or abroad. However, national recommendations differ according to the indicated age groups and of the vaccine. as vaccines are country recommendations should be Recently, the Canadian Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel issued guidance on the and recommendations for meningococcal disease vaccination in travelers. In the guidelines recommend a to the to Vaccination should be considered for any individuals traveling to a region of meningococcal disease caused by one of the in the include not only the African meningitis belt countries guidelines that the dry season from country to country and the time to to but also those countries in sub‐Saharan Africa the traditional meningitis belt where recent epidemics have including the and The guidelines also recommend vaccination for the groups of travelers who may have prolonged close contact with the local population in these areas, but specify this may include and those public In to areas with active vaccination may also be for travelers to areas with disease including industrialized where sporadic cases of disease have been reported in the previous 6 In developed countries, travelers should the recommendations of the Although vaccination against serogroup with a vaccine is required for all Canadian CATMAT that this vaccination does not to individuals traveling to destinations where disease due to other is serogroup is due to this risk, and the preferred vaccine is a glycoconjugate quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine due to its polysaccharide vaccines including longer of of hyporesponsiveness with and possible of carriage For the of travelers, those not to Saudi Arabia or those not entering college where vaccination is required in the United the to is based essentially on an of the risk to the individual of developing disease of becoming a carrier of This must account for destination, and of potential and background health of the traveler (Figure Because meningococcal vaccines are associated with few events and these need to be vaccination for travelers. = = Kingdom of Saudi UK = United US = United = visiting friends and vaccination should be recommended for all travelers visiting destinations with outbreaks or epidemic that be, except those who have been vaccinated within the past 3 years. There are that can on active areas, such as developed by a As most groups recommend vaccination against meningococcal disease for at some travelers with destinations in the African meningitis belt. There is whether this recommendation should be limited to the dry season, by various as from to June or only December to 8 or in of the no to be in the WHO and 44 experts also consider parts of the Rift Valley in Africa, including parts of and to as many risks as the traditional meningitis but not the destinations in Recommendations may also differ based on risk of to meningococcal disease in the high‐risk countries as in the A meningococcal vaccine that all is for travelers to the African meningitis belt due to the need to against that disease in the the general factors, we must also consider that personal living and and social behavior a or for (eg, in refugee may be at higher In the African meningitis any health should consider not only the of but also whether there will be close contact to the local population in the the and type of public in dormitories or similar may an increased risk of transmission, and meningococcal vaccination at to be Finally, factors need to be into There is that, for persons with and some with or should meningococcal vaccination regardless of This factor is and a is an for vaccination in such however, infection is not an for meningococcal vaccination, such patients these patients may only have received a vaccine against serogroup and may quadrivalent Some health care will also consider that children are at higher risk of that travelers may be and at higher risk of As with many other immunization in the general population, the of vaccinating travelers is to both the individual from meningococcal disease and society from its In of the large variety of against all vaccine‐preventable is and therefore meningococcal vaccines are to be preferred vaccines for travelers. meningococcal glycoconjugate vaccines should be preferred polysaccharide vaccines due to their in terms of in of immunologic longer of apparent of hyporesponsiveness with repeat and in carriage of N 43 vaccines are particularly considering that the of immunization in travelers is to the risk of disease in the individual as well as the of transmission to and the international spread of At there are two glycoconjugate meningococcal vaccines that against disease caused by C, W‐135, and for use in individuals aged to 55 one also to Although these vaccines are and well remain in our against meningococcal disease. There currently is no vaccine that against of N meningitidis serogroup which is a of meningococcal disease outbreaks and epidemics in many regions in the the of the serogroup in recent years, in must be as there is no vaccine for Finally, there is no vaccine currently indicated for against meningococcal disease in 2 years of However, there is for the future. A glycoconjugate meningococcal vaccine is now in various countries that can be from the age of 2 against serogroup B are in national travel recommendations may travel with an to meningococcal vaccination as a to and spread of disease by International is has for and on for attending for from and
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».