MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1975413644 · doi:10.1353/pgn.0.0031

Saints and the Audience in Middle English Biblical Drama (review)

2008· article· en· W1975413644 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueParergon · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaSophisticationRhetorical questionLiteratureInterpretation (philosophy)RhetoricCharacter (mathematics)ArtSociologyMedia studiesHistoryAestheticsTheologyPhilosophyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Saints and the Audience in Middle English Biblical Drama Rosemary Dunn Scoville, Chester N. , Saints and the Audience in Middle English Biblical Drama, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2004; cloth; pp.140 ; R.R.P. C$50.00; ISBN 0802089445. Our understanding of medieval drama has developed considerably in the last hundred years, and few would blithely dismiss such plays as simplistic fodder for the peasants. The artistic and theological sophistication has been acknowledged, but the academic interpretation has, at times, favoured the sinners over the saints, and has tended to see complexity and development of character in the subversive and interesting sinners. Chester Scoville sets out to argue, neatly and persuasively, that medieval drama incorporated rhetorical strategies to encourage the audience to respond positively to the good and negatively to the bad. In sum: 'This book argues that the techniques used by medieval playwrights to create characters were rhetorical in nature, that the central characters of the plays are the saints, the heroes and the virtuous; and that the function of these central characters was, as already discussed, to unite the community of the audience in its desire for holy living' (p. 7). By examining characters through these rhetorical strategies, Scoville raises interesting questions about the intention of the playwrights, and also about the intelligence of the audience who are not, in his view, simply told what to believe, but are encouraged to think through the emotional responses and are persuaded, not bludgeoned, into appreciating and therefore committing themselves to, the life of the good. The four characters he chooses are four saints: Thomas, Mary Magdalene, Joseph and Paul, who must all deal with the conflict of doubt and faith. [End Page 252] A re-evaluation of Thomas produces a reevaluation of the sophistication of the Towneley play and the interrelationship in the play of logos to ethos and pathos. Thomas as Doubter is the sceptic and rationalist, but his transformation to knower and believer is achieved, not just through empirical demonstration but also through the manipulation of the audience's evaluation of the value of logos. Logos, as represented in the Law of Paul, is shown as inadequate and Scoville argues that the characters, indeed, 'had to come painfully to grips with the inability of argument, logos or speech to convey belief in the resurrection' (p. 18). The play draws the audience through the inadequacy of pure logos, through faith (sensorial) and ethos (in the speeches) to a new understanding of knowledge itself which is embodied in the eloquent body of Christ rather than in the words. Thomas encapsulates the notion of transcending ethos and logos through pathos to develop a Christian rhetoric that is more responsive to the whole human. Mary Magdalene is viewed through the ethos of her physical appearance; her beauty is not merely a temptation to sin but an indication of her worthiness and of her as a vehicle of grace. Here beauty reflects De Doctrina Christiana's dictum that the role of rhetoric is to teach, to delight and to persuade. Mary speaks in a high style rhetorically, which verbally manifests her authority. The Digby Mary is not a prostitute but a lady who, as Apostle to the Apostles, speaks truth and that truth is reflected in her words. By contrast, the pagans' language descends into gobbledygook. Language and signs refer to far more than themselves. In the flawed, but repentant, eloquent and moving character of Mary, the audience has a figure not only 'to admire, imitate and follow, but also a bridge between themselves and the Church of the Apostles'. Joseph is a more shadowy character, who is introduced through rhetorical strategies, particularly pathos. Although often considered a comic character, Scoville describes a more complex figure who, through his words, actions and quiet but persistent faith, is a challenge to the viewers. They, confronted with the sceptical and all too human questions of Joseph, must query the strength of their own faith. As Joseph struggles with juridical understandings of righteousness, the rhetorical limitations of a purely human structure become apparent to the audience. Paul is both supreme rhetorician and, initially, sceptic. In the Digby play his roles are many; as...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,802
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,719

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,175 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle