'Pictures Bring Us Messages' / Sinaakssiiksi aohtsimaahpihkookiyaawa: Photographs and Histories from the Kainai Nation (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: 'Pictures Bring Us Messages' / Sinaakssiiksi aohtsimaahpihkookiyaawa: Photographs and Histories from the Kainai Nation Judith Nasby Alison K. Brown and Laura Peers, with members of the Kainai Nation. 'Pictures Bring Us Messages' / Sinaakssiiksi aohtsimaahpihkookiyaawa: Photographs and Histories from the Kainai Nation. University of Toronto Press. xviii, 280. $29.95 In 1925 Beatrice Blackwood, an Oxford researcher, spent two days visiting the Blood First Nation Reserve in southern Alberta. She took thirty-three photographs of Kainai men, women, and children, recorded their measurements, and took hair samples as part of an anthropology project. Her photographs and field notes are in the collection of the University of Oxford's Pitt Rivers Museum. In 2001 researcher Alison K. Brown and curator Laura Peers worked with members of the source community to gain a better understanding of their perspectives on [End Page 350] Blackwood's photographs. The authors discuss the history of stereo-typical views of Aboriginal people taken by non-Native photographers from the early exploratory expeditions in the west, to the anthropological records of the dying races, to Edward Curtis's romantic portraits. Another objective was to gain a fuller understanding of early-twentieth-century history of the Kainai Nation when they were facing enormous challenges of poverty, government seizures of their land for non-native settlement, adoption of a new farming and ranching economy, the detrimental affect of residential schools on cultural values, and the government's prohibition of parts of their sacred Sundance ceremony. Brown and Peers, together with members of the Kainai Nation, also address a concern that some Aboriginal histories have been written on the basis of inadequate and incorrect field observations held in archival collections. The appendix contains a statement of consent for interviewees and a protocol agreement between the Mookaakin Cultural Heritage Foundation and the Pitt Rivers Museum stating that the museum would repatriate a set of Blackwood's photographs, recover information about culture and history through interviewing the elders, write a short book, inform museum professionals in the United Kingdom (and elsewhere) about the significance of photographs in recovering cultural information for First Nations People, and help develop a continuing community-based education project, exhibition, or teaching materials. The foundation in turn provided the names of individuals who were interviewed. The appendix contains a fascinating comparison between Blackwood's diary and commentary on her observations by members of the Kainai Nation, who reveal that some of Blackwood's observations were based on assumptions or comments by the Indian agent who accompanied her on a tour of the reserve. Another outcome of the collaborative project was the recovery of names of many individuals portrayed in the photographs. The book records the process of their collaborative community-based research, serving as a sound methodology for curators and scholars undertaking similar projects, and the useful protocols and agreements serve as models for working with Aboriginal archival collections. Judith Nasby Macdonald Stewart Art Centre, University of Guelph Copyright © 2008 University of Toronto Press Incorporated
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».