MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1976008565 · doi:10.1353/aiq.2004.0087

From Nansemond to Monacan: The Legacy of the Pochick-Nansemond among the Bear Mountain Monacan

2003· article· en· W1976008565 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jay Hansford C. Vest

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe American Indian Quarterly · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArchaeology and Natural History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWhite (mutation)RidgePopulationGeographyEthnologyDemographyArchaeologyHistoryCartographySociology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1948, Library of Congress scholar William Gilbert wrote: "Indian blood still remains noticeable in our eastern States population in spite of the depletions arising from over 300 years of wars, invasions by disease and white men from Europe and black men from Africa."1 Noting that Virginia's surviving Indian groups tended to retain traditions of their Native origin, Gilbert identified several Indian groups along the Blue Ridge and Piedmont zones of the state. Stating these concentrations "beginning with Rappahannock County in the north and continuing southward along the Blue Ridge through Rockbridge and Amherst counties and striking directly southward to Halifax County on the North Carolina border," he gave definition to the geographical occupation of these interior Virginia tribal groups.2 Specifically he identified five hundred to six hundred mixed-bloods in central and the extreme western end of Amherst County near Bear Mountain and Tobacco Row Mountain of the Blue Ridge. Known locally as "issues," he describes these people as having "a very rich brunette with straight black hair and Caucasian features."3 Acknowledging a second group northwest of Amherst County, he further identified a population of over three hundred "Brown people" exhibiting "a mixture of white, Indian, and occasionally Negro blood." While self-identified as American Indians, these groups were locally considered to be "mulattos" but acknowledged as "a group apart from both whites and Negroes."4 Before proceeding with this history of a Pochick-Nansemond band among the Monacans, we would do well to acknowledge the derogatory nature of the racial epithets, such as "issues," "brown people," and "mulattoes" as they were inappropriately applied to these Native people. The [End Page 781] term mulatto, however, does have a legal history in the confines of Virginia law. As early as 1705, Virginia law held that "the child of an Indian and the child, grand child, or great grand child of a negro shall be deemed, accounted, held and taken to be a mulatto."5 The legislative intention was clearly to include Indians among the colony's colored population, thereby creating a biracial—white and colored—society. The mulatto definition inclusive of Indians was re-affirmed in the subsequent racial codes including the racial integrity acts of 1822 and 1924. Under the authority of Walter Ashby Plecker, M.D., registrar of the Virginia Bureau of Vital Statistics, "there were only two races in Virginia: white and 'colored,' which to him and to most people meant black."6 As a consequence of this legislation, all Indians became legally mulattos, an ambiguous racial category in colonial folklore reflecting admixtures of race, including black-white, Indian-white, Indian-black. American Indians were, nonetheless, classified mulatto regardless of racial admixture, so that Virginia's full-blood Indians could be deemed mulatto under the terms of the racial codes. Mestizo, the Spanish folklore for Indian-white admixtures was never in use in Virginia.7 Consequently when one finds reference to a mulatto in a known Virginia Indian community, one cannot immediately assume that the mulatto referenced is a racially mixed person and by no means should one conclude that the possible admixture is solely black. In fact, evidence suggests that mulatto admixtures among the Virginia Indians were largely white beginning presumably with Thomas Rolfe. While the preceding brief summary exhausts the information supplied by Gilbert, it does not begin to manifest the social history and cultural significance of these surviving Virginia Piedmont and Blue Ridge Indian groups. In recent years, the scholarly consideration of the central Blue Ridge Indian communities has advanced considerably thanks to the work of Peter Houck. Houck's Indian Island in Amherst County (1984) manifests significant scholarly efforts in exploring and explicating the mystery and history of the Rockbridge-Amherst Indian communities that Gilbert noted in 1948.8 Indeed, Houck's work served as the benchmark for the state's formal...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,729
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,544

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0220,004
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe American Indian QuarterlyMême sujetArchaeology and Natural HistoryTravaux en français237 207