MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1976017516 · doi:10.1002/cyto.a.10102

Twenty‐five years of clinical flow cytometry: AIDS accelerated global instrument distribution

2004· review· en· W1976017516 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCytometry Part A · 2004
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueHIV Research and Treatment
Établissements canadiensAIDS Vancouver
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As a cell biologist, one experiences some ambivalence with an enigmatic sensation on the occasion of the silver jubilee of Clinical Cytometry. This significant milestone is celebrated with ominous feelings because of the remarkable symbiosis that was forged between the birth of a new clinical diagnostic tool and the emergence of one of the most devastating infectious diseases of the 20th century. It is less then 25 years ago that the first reports surfaced about clusters of aggressive opportunistic infections appearing mysteriously in young gay men in some metropolitan areas in the United States (1, 2). The causative agent of the epidemic was unknown, yet the disease was well characterized within a very short time span as the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The initial CDC definition of AIDS incorporated leukocyte subset numbers from peripheral blood. AIDS' defining condition included CD4 T-cell counts of 200 or less (3, 4). Initially, in most immunology laboratories, immunophenotyping was performed with fluorescent microcopy. But quickly, the choice of assay method shifted to flow cytometry. As the world-wide apocalyptic devastation began, cellular immunologists engaged in research had at their disposal an arsenal of reagents and instruments just waiting for an opportunity for qualitative assessment of immunodeficiency. Therefore, in a very short time, instruments that could count T-helper cells were in great demand. The epidemic had profound impact throughout the Western world, but those initial human losses paled in comparison with the carnage AIDS delivered and still is delivering in resource-poor regions of the globe. It is estimated that in 2003, over 40 million individuals live with AIDS; about 10% of this population lives in South Africa. Most of the time, significant scientific progress occurs in dull obscurity, but occasionally human curiosity prevails and the odd science story proceeds with significant fanfare. The discoverers of the structure of DNA did receive immediate accolades. However, in most instances of technical breakthroughs in diagnostics, the assessment of the day falls short of appropriate recognition. Invariably the press selects trivia to report as newsworthy science. For example, the postmortem analysis of the space shuttle disaster received phenomenal coverage. Polemical reports were bombarding us about how scientists were able to demonstrate that a piece of the foam debris at a certain velocity could have or could not have damaged critical ceramic tiles attached to the wing on that doomed and most unfortunate space vehicle. At the same time, this past July, a subcommittee of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists identified the 110th element. The new chart recognizes darmstadtium (Ds) as a unique element. It was formally added to the Periodic Chart. This latter event received virtually no publicity, while the significance of the finding is relatively easy to convey to the public, as we all learned about the elements while taking high school chemistry. The low profile coverage that is often associated with our discipline was altered forever 25 years ago. Events in cytology during the early 1980s were going to unfold in a most uneventful fashion. However, with a newly discovered incredibly devastating lethal disease on the horizon, the role of the underrated flow cytometer changed forever. Because reliable diagnosing of immunodeficiency was an essential requirement, clinical cytometry was born. With flow, rapid diagnosis of AIDS was possible as early as 1981 (1). Clinical immunophenotyping was possible just a few years after the discovery of the hybridoma technology. It opened the possibility for the production of mAbs with high affinity and avidity. Between 1978 and 1981, Milstein, Reinhertz, Schlossman, Goldstein, Janossy, and many others were diligently cranking out antibody-producing murine clones and were defining and assigning function-specific roles to markers on human T- and B-cells. Flow cytometry, a laser-based technology, was photogenic and there were no serological tests available to feature. Therefore, flow cytometry profited from seemingly spontaneous and persistent press coverage. The virtuosity and veracity of the investigators' productivity a quarter-century ago expedited research capacity in immunology beyond any expectations. Unfortunately, to date the regulatory role of various T-cell subsets has not been fully resolved. The scholarly struggle to gain more knowledge in this area, including oncology, has advanced, but it is far from over. There is always a silver lining to any human catastrophe. The story of the AIDS pandemic is no exception. In this case, 25 years ago we had instrumentation to analyze peripheral blood cells, but there was no apparent wide-scale clinical application beyond differentiating various leukemia or lymphomas. We had an awesome new technology bundle that used laser power to recognize mAbs labeled with a variety of fluorochromes. The analysis included both intracellular and surface markers on leukocytes, but without relevant clinical utility. In medical diagnostics, progress is usually comparable to the work of the flow and ebb of the sea on shards of broken glass. Eventually, the sea will wash ashore a smooth mermaid's tear, a smooth-edged glass gem. Twenty-five years ago there was no time for mermaids' tears to be shed. Thanks to AIDS, practically overnight, the utility of flow cytometers became a clinical reality. A diagnostic technology was developed that harnesses simultaneously both intrinsic and extrinsic attributes of leukocytes (5). The rapid diagnosis of AIDS became possible years before the etiological agent for the disease was discovered (6). The most extensive and incredible global public health project ever undertaken that involves the use of flow cytometry is just beginning to unfold. Unprecedented large-scale administration of antiretrovirals is on its way. All this dramatic activity is occurring in resource-poor regions, on three different continents. For example, in Brazil alone there are 85 flow cytometers in the field, supported by external quality assessment programs to monitor antiretroviral drug administration. Effective triple therapy is available at $150 per year, when it is over $10,000 per year in most of Europe and North America. It is anticipated that the cost of CD4 T-cell enumeration will drop from the average $50 to under $5 in many resource-poor regions within the next 12 months. A greater than one log cost reduction of a diagnostic test will have profound effect on infectious disease control in a global context. The ultimate aim is to take advantage of this momentum and develop more advanced flow cytometers as the heart of a new universal multiplexed and multitasking diagnostic platform (7, 8). The next generation of flow-based modular platforms will open an era of affordable and comprehensive diagnostics by telemetry in the global village. Cytomics will take us to uncharted dimensions of integrated diagnostic medicine of the 21st century in a Jules Vernean vision. Stay tuned for the next 25 years.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,988
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,103
Tête enseignante GPT0,415
Écart entre enseignants0,312 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle