135 LEVELS OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES (ROS), APOPTOSIS AND CRYORESISTANCE OF BOVINE EMBRYOS PRODUCED IN VITRO IN THE PRESENCE OF ANTIOXIDANTS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The production of ROS is a normal process that occurs in cellular mitochondrial respiratory chain. However, the increase in ROS due to the high oxygen tension during in vitro production of bovine embryos induces oxidative stress, leading to embryonic development failure. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplementation with antioxidants (cysteine – CIST; ß-mercaptoethanol – ßME and catalase – CAT) during in vitro maturation (IVM) and in vitro culture (IVC) on the embryo development, cryoresistance, and quality, as well as the amounts of intracellular ROS produced during embryo culture. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (n = 565) were IVM in medium TCM-199 supplemented with 0.6 mM CIST, 100 µM ßME, 100 UI CAT, or without antioxidants (Contr). After fertilization, zygotes were IVC in SOF medium during the first 72 h (up to Day 3) with or without addition of the same antioxidant used for IVM, and then all the embryos were transferred to SOF medium without antioxidants. All cultures were conducted at 38.5°C in 5% CO2 in air. The cleavage and blastocysts rates were evaluated, respectively, at 72 and 168 h post-insemination. Part of obtained blastocysts (n = 133) was vitrified (Ingámed®, Maringá, PR, Brazil). The remaining was stained (n = 46) with 5 µM of the fluorescent probe 6-carboxy-2'7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA; Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Oakville, Canada) or stained (n = 62) for TUNEL (In situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein, Roche Applied Science, IN, USA). Stained embryos were immediately evaluated under an epifluorescence inverted microscope and the images of embryos stained with H2DCFDA were analyzed by Q-Capture Pro image software (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada) for determining the fluorescent intensity. The vitrified embryos were thawed and cultured for 24 h to evaluate the re-expansion rates. The difference between groups was compared by ANOVA followed by Tukey test, and re-expansion rates by chi-square test (P < 0.05). The cleavage rates were 82.9% ± 3.2a (Contr), 80.4% ± 2.5a (CIST), 87.0% ± 1.8a (ßME) and 81.2% ± 3.0a (CAT). The blastocyst rates were 48.7% ± 3.4ab (Contr), 34.4% ± 4.2b (CIST), 36.0% ± 5.6ab (ßME), and 56.8% ± 7.5a (CAT). The re-expansion rates were 76.0%ab (Contr), 66.7%b (CIST), 50.0%b (ßME), and 66.1%b (CAT). The fluorescent intensity was 1.0 ± 0.07a (Contr), 0.8 ± 0.05bc (CIST), 0.6 ± 0.05c (ßME) and 0.7 ± 0.07bc (CAT). The total number of cells was 85.7 ± 3.5a (Contr), 89.6 ± 4.8a (CIST), 99.5 ± 5.4a (ßME), and 81.5 ± 4.3a (CAT), and the rate of apoptotic cells was 4.3 ± 1.2a (Contr), 1.5 ± 0.4b (CIST), 1.6 ± 0.4b (ßME), and 2.4 ± 0.6ab (CAT). Supplementation with CAT improved embryo development, compared with CIST (P < 0.05). The fluorescent intensity was lower for all embryos produced with antioxidants (P < 0.05) and the rate of apoptosis was reduced in CIST and ßME (P < 0.05). In conclusion, supplementation with antioxidants is an interesting strategy to improve the embryo quality since it reduces the cell death caused by oxidative stress. However, such improvement in embryo quality did not affect embryo cryotolerance. Financial support was provided by CNPq and FAPESP 01/18257-2.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».