MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1976417412 · doi:10.1353/uni.2014.0003

Rebelling against Prophecy in Harry Potter and The Underland Chronicles

2014· article· en· W1976417412 sur OpenAlexaff
Chantel Lavoie

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œLion and the unicorn · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensRoyal Military College of Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTheme (computing)NarrativeCourageLiteratureHarry potterInterpretation (philosophy)PhilosophyHistoryArtTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Rebelling against Prophecy in Harry Potter and The Underland Chronicles Chantel Lavoie (bio) In recent years, two stories about a boy becoming a man through extraordinary trials, courage, self-sacrifice, and critical thinking—one essentially Christian and the other insistently atheist—have shared the theme of prophecy. J. K. Rowling and Suzanne Collins have each written series in which an eleven-year-old enters a new world burdened with a prophecy foretelling his early death. These predictions are revealed piecemeal so that only in the final book of each series does the boy learn of his fate. In Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, the seventh and last installment in Rowling’s series (1997–2007), Harry finds out that certain death accompanies the distinction of being “the chosen one” in the wizarding world. Gregor learns the same thing in Collins’s Gregor and the Code of Claw, the fifth and final book in The Underland Chronicles (2003–7): the prophetic line “When the warrior has been killed” refers to him (4). Rowling and Collins work through the theme of the prophetic in their narratives with a mixture of credulous and resistant characters. Both authors emphasize that prophecy is open to interpretation, and so to manipulation, by anyone, on any side. As a narrative device, prophecy is ancient. Entailing inspiration from the gods or God, insight into the future and on the present state of things, the implications of prophecy are capacious. Rowling and Collins use it to propel their plots, to create suspense, and to explain the seemingly inexplicable, but prophecy is ultimately abandoned by the narratives, as actions replace words and the present breaks away from the past at story’s end. While seeking to convey important messages about justice, tolerance, and peace, both authors avail themselves of the forceful motif of the death of the hero. The two series are nevertheless profoundly different, for although both Rowling and Collins are concerned with preventing unnecessary death, only Rowling’s text urges the reader to think through and accept death’s inevitability, as well as its mystery. Consequently, a deep gulf [End Page 45] opens between the depictions of prophecy in the two series. In Harry Potter, prophecy is subject to human error; in the Underland series, it is nothing more than human error. Harry Potter’s near-death and orphaning were the evil wizard Voldemort’s attempt to prevent the fulfillment of a prophecy. Voldemort paradoxically realizes the prophecy by turning this “boy who lived” into the tyrant’s own nemesis,1 which plays an increasingly significant role thereafter. A consideration of Collins’s books—a series that, apart from recent work by Sarah Fiona Winters in the pages of this journal—has met with scant attention due to the proximate release of Collins’s popular Hunger Games series (2008–10). The Underland Chronicles challenge a number of Judeo-Christian traditions in Western children’s literature,2 and it seems likely, given the overwhelming awareness of Harry Potter at the beginning of the twenty-first century, that the series responds to Rowling.3 The plot of Harry Potter is sufficiently well known to omit repeating. The Underland Chronicles are about a poor boy living in a small New York apartment with his mother, two sisters, and grandmother. His father, a science teacher, has been inexplicably absent for two years. In the first book, Gregor the Overlander (2003), the title character and his two-year-old sister, Boots, discover his whereabouts in a dark land under Manhattan that Collins has likened to a “what if” version of Lewis Carroll’s Wonderland. Gregor and Boots fall down an air vent to a world where sentient species, including giant cockroaches, rats, bats, mice, ants, and paper-pale, violet-eyed humans, battle alongside and against each other for survival. Gregor is hailed and feared, as the long awaited warrior prophesied by Bartholomew of Sandwich must make critical decisions through the five books involving negotiation, diplomacy, fighting, subterfuge, and allegiances. He encounters a royal family: the kindly sage Vikus, his war-mongering wife, Solovet, and their proud heir, Luxa, who will grow to love Gregor. Gregor increasingly finds that he is entrapped by the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,835
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,370

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,186
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œLion and the unicornMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207