First Report of a Leaf Spot Caused by <i>Alternaria compacta</i> on <i>Hydrangea anomala</i> subsp. <i>petiolaris</i> in Italy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hydrangea anomala subsp. petiolaris (synonym H. petiolaris and H. scandens), also known as climbing hydrangea, is cultivated as an ornamental for landscaping in parks and gardens. This species, belonging to the Hydrangeaceae and native to the woodlands of Japan and coastal China, is widely appreciated for its abundant, creamy white flowers with a sweet aroma, particularly in shade gardens. During the summer of 2006, extensive necroses were observed on leaves and young stems of 3-year-old plants grown outdoors in several gardens of Piedmont of northern Italy. In many cases, on the upper side of the leaves, necrotic spots (4 to 10 mm in diameter) turned progressively black. Lesions often coalesced, generating larger (2 to 6 cm in diameter) necrotic areas. Necroses initially developed mainly at leaf margins and near petioles, and severely affected plants were defoliated. Infected plants rarely died, but the presence of lesions reduced the aesthetic quality and subsequently the commercial value. The disease occurred on 50 of 100 plants. A fungus was consistently isolated from infected leaves on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and identified on the basis of its morphological characteristics as an Alternaria sp. Conidia were dark gray, multicellular, clavate to pear shaped, measuring 23 to 54 × 10 to 13 μm (average 38 × 12 μm), with five longitudinal crosswalls and a relatively short apical beak. DNA was extracted with a Nucleospin Plant Kit (Macherey Nagel, Brockville, ON, Canada) and PCR was carried out with ITS 6/ITS 4 primer (2). A 557-bp PCR product was sequenced, and a BLASTn search (1) confirmed that the sequence corresponded to Alternaria compacta (99% homology). The nucleotide sequence has been assigned GenBank Accession No. EU 128529. Pathogenicity tests were performed by spraying leaves of healthy 1-year-old potted H. anomala plants with an aqueous 105 CFU/ml spore suspension. The inoculum was obtained from cultures of the fungus grown on sterilized host leaves placed on PDA for 20 days in light/dark at 23 ± 1°C. Plants sprayed only with water served as controls. Five plants were used for each treatment. Plants were covered with plastic bags for 3 days after inoculation and maintained between 12 and 22°C. Lesions developed on leaves 8 days after inoculation with the spore suspension, whereas control plants remained healthy. A. compacta was consistently reisolated from these lesions. The pathogenicity test was repeated twice. The presence of an Alternaria sp. on H. macrophylla was reported in the United States (3), whereas A. hortensiae was observed in Spain on H. hortensis. Recently, A. alternata belonging to the alternata group was reported on H. macrophylla in Italy (4). This is, to our knowledge, the first report of A. compacta on H anomala subsp. petiolaris in Italy. References: (1) S. F. Altschud et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 25:3389, 1997. (2) D. E. L. Cooke and J. M. Duncan. Mycol. Res. 101:667, 1997. (3) M. L. Daughtrey et al. Page 9 in: Compendium of Flowering Potted Plant Diseases. American Phytopathological Society. St. Paul, MN, 1995. (4) A. Garibaldi et al. Plant Dis. 91:767, 2007.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».