Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Thank you for your recent editorial1 with its entertaining and informative example of patient-centred care (PCC). (Since I already serve ethically sourced coffee and have lovely plants, the only thing lacking in my practice seems to be a leather sofa. . . .) I do position myself as a PCC provider, so I started to think of my own patient interactions that could exemplify “a professional obligation to take responsibility for, and provide care targeted to, the individual patient’s needs.”1 Like most community pharmacies, I provide weekly pill pack medications that aim to increase ease of adherence to the chosen drug therapy. But what if the patient is consistently not able to access their pill packs, resulting in (undisclosed) undertreatment? CH, a 47-year-old woman with fibromyalgia, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, depression and restless leg syndrome, came into the pharmacy with her 12-year-old daughter to pick up her 4-week pill packs. Previously, we had provided CH with a separate bedtime pill pack, since her bedroom was on the second storey of their home and her pill pack was usually left in the kitchen (to facilitate better adherence of other medications). CH reported the separate bedtime pill pack to be extremely useful. Upon reviewing the contents of her current pill pack, CH’s daughter disclosed that her mother’s supper pills were often “left over.” CH explained that it was difficult to remember to take the supper pills and that they were often skipped. The medications that were intended for supper dosing were as follows: Ramipril 10 mg (1 of 2 daily doses) Nifedipine XL 20 mg (entire daily dose) Rabeprazole 20 mg (1 of 2 daily doses) Pregabalin 50 mg (1 of 3 daily doses) Undertreatment of her hypertension was my first concern. Although CH did not have time for me to take her blood pressure, I did request that we check it at her next visit. She did admit to not feeling the “greatest” and sleeping poorly. I also inquired about her previous stomach complaints. CH reported that the rabeprazole was to treat belching following eating meat, which had neither gotten worse or better since the physician initiated the treatment and even increased the dose from every day to twice a day, although many of the second doses were admittedly missed. I reviewed the supper dosing with CH and asked if she would be agreeable to switching the medications over to bedtime if it was reasonable to do so. CH agreed, and I called the physician to discuss CH’s medication management. According to the physician, CH’s blood pressure (as per clinic visits) had not been well controlled, so the physician agreed to institute my changes before increasing doses or adding any new medications. CH’s objective and subjective symptoms would be reviewed at the next clinic visit, as well as at the next pharmacy visit. The following were the changes made for CH: Ramipril 10 mg AM and supper changed to AM and before bedtime Nifedipine XL 20 mg at supper changed to before bedtime Rabeprazole 20 mg AM and supper changed to once a day, since it had not been any more effective for her “burping” after meat consumption with the twice-a-day dosing Pregabalin 50 mg AM, supper and before bedtime changed to 50 mg AM and 100 mg before bedtime Follow-up with CH on adherence and disease management is still pending. I feel that this scenario is a good example of listening to the patient’s needs and creating medication management techniques that are better suited to the individual while still optimizing pharmacological effectiveness. There are more glamorous examples of patient-centred care, but this is a simple example of potentially preventing unnecessary increases in medication therapy. PS: I also really appreciated the literature review on the top 5 cardiology studies from 2011 to 2012. I do hope you provide us with more! ■
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,061 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,201 | 0,047 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».