The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity Deborah Staines Dana Heller, ed. The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 304 pp. $35 cloth. The American government's responses to the events of 11 September 2001 were predictably violent. Academia's responses to 11 September were mostly through the field of textual production. Many post-9/11 publications—both those already in print and those scheduled for imminent release—are embedded within the think-tank culture of political science, security analysis, and intelligence and can be read as simply more advice for how to kill more deliberately, more persuasively. The Selling of 9/11 (2005), however, is dominated by academics from the humanities and [End Page 246] focuses on reading the way 9/11 has been articulated in consumer culture; it speaks very little about killing but closely examines some of the commodity minutiae and social discontinuities that the catastrophic events of 9/11 precipitated. It will be most useful for students of American Studies, but it also has some essays which speak to a broader audience. One of the best is by communications professor Lynn Spigel, writing on “Entertainment Wars: Television Culture after 9/11.” Spigel is interested in how 9/11's searing images and cultural multiplicities were realized through television's unique capacity for dealing with unfixed culturail flows. Spigel finds that the catastrophe exposed a conflict between television's historical status as a public interest medium and its everyday commercial payload. She argues that American television responded by using its flows to communicate 9/11 across a range of genres including news, comedy, ads, and prime-time drama. Spigel analyzes the ways in which the television's scene of the imaginary articulated connections with the political and military scenes and posits that television played a distinct role in restoring the dominant social and cultural orders of “normalcy,” through its quite fluid manipulation of cultural media. The introduction “Consuming 9/11,” by editor Dana Heller, focuses on consumer logics, reading consumerism as a modus operandi of identity, especially national identity. Heller finds in popular images of the firefighters at 9/11, a “process of reimagining social relationships” across lines of race, ethnicity, and gender into rewritten myths of national identity. Here, as throughout this volume, is perhaps too much of an emphasis on what happened in New York—in this context, no doubt functioning as the symbol of trade and capital—and insufficient attention to the Pentagon attack and the downing of Flight 93. The 9/11 Commission's substantial report is not cited, and thus an important object in circulation falls outside the ambit of this consumer analysis, even though it, too, is for sale. In positing a “market” of 9/11 culture, Heller highlights the practice of “hoarding” of pre-9/11 images of the World Trade Center towers, and criticizes the surfeit of “ritual” images which saturated America culture, citing Laura Berlant and ideas of repackaged emotions. However, since this volume too fails to come to grips with the forensic geography of 9/11, and some deeply felt practices of remembrance, that criticism seems a little beside the point. Heller's strength is in perceiving the wide field of commodity products and consumer demands and their relationship to catastrophe as a market relation and what this says about contemporary culture. In this sense, 9/11 is shown to have rendered visible the architectonics of American culture, in a way that the military and political responses perhaps did not. [End Page 247] Typifying this approach also are Jennifer Scanlon's ironic and stylish essay on flag decals and a joint-authored piece by Australians Mick Broderick and Mark Gibson. Scanlon's “Your flag decal won't get you into heaven anymore,” uses the massive uptake of the United States flag—actual flags and flag decals, slogans, and signs—to critique the cringe-worthy relationship between Wal-Mart, patriotism, and impoverishments of both symbolic and real capital. She shows how patriotism is performed through the purchase of goods, how retail stores laid claim to being patriotic sites, and how neatly...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».