MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1977139236 · doi:10.1353/esc.0.0023

The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity (review)

2006· article· en· W1977139236 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Deborah Staines

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueMedia Studies and Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTragedy (event)CommodityPoliticsEntertainmentMedia studiesReality televisionSociologyLawPolitical scienceHistoryLiteratureArtBusiness

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity Deborah Staines Dana Heller, ed. The Selling of 9/11: How a National Tragedy Became a Commodity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 304 pp. $35 cloth. The American government's responses to the events of 11 September 2001 were predictably violent. Academia's responses to 11 September were mostly through the field of textual production. Many post-9/11 publications—both those already in print and those scheduled for imminent release—are embedded within the think-tank culture of political science, security analysis, and intelligence and can be read as simply more advice for how to kill more deliberately, more persuasively. The Selling of 9/11 (2005), however, is dominated by academics from the humanities and [End Page 246] focuses on reading the way 9/11 has been articulated in consumer culture; it speaks very little about killing but closely examines some of the commodity minutiae and social discontinuities that the catastrophic events of 9/11 precipitated. It will be most useful for students of American Studies, but it also has some essays which speak to a broader audience. One of the best is by communications professor Lynn Spigel, writing on “Entertainment Wars: Television Culture after 9/11.” Spigel is interested in how 9/11's searing images and cultural multiplicities were realized through television's unique capacity for dealing with unfixed culturail flows. Spigel finds that the catastrophe exposed a conflict between television's historical status as a public interest medium and its everyday commercial payload. She argues that American television responded by using its flows to communicate 9/11 across a range of genres including news, comedy, ads, and prime-time drama. Spigel analyzes the ways in which the television's scene of the imaginary articulated connections with the political and military scenes and posits that television played a distinct role in restoring the dominant social and cultural orders of “normalcy,” through its quite fluid manipulation of cultural media. The introduction “Consuming 9/11,” by editor Dana Heller, focuses on consumer logics, reading consumerism as a modus operandi of identity, especially national identity. Heller finds in popular images of the firefighters at 9/11, a “process of reimagining social relationships” across lines of race, ethnicity, and gender into rewritten myths of national identity. Here, as throughout this volume, is perhaps too much of an emphasis on what happened in New York—in this context, no doubt functioning as the symbol of trade and capital—and insufficient attention to the Pentagon attack and the downing of Flight 93. The 9/11 Commission's substantial report is not cited, and thus an important object in circulation falls outside the ambit of this consumer analysis, even though it, too, is for sale. In positing a “market” of 9/11 culture, Heller highlights the practice of “hoarding” of pre-9/11 images of the World Trade Center towers, and criticizes the surfeit of “ritual” images which saturated America culture, citing Laura Berlant and ideas of repackaged emotions. However, since this volume too fails to come to grips with the forensic geography of 9/11, and some deeply felt practices of remembrance, that criticism seems a little beside the point. Heller's strength is in perceiving the wide field of commodity products and consumer demands and their relationship to catastrophe as a market relation and what this says about contemporary culture. In this sense, 9/11 is shown to have rendered visible the architectonics of American culture, in a way that the military and political responses perhaps did not. [End Page 247] Typifying this approach also are Jennifer Scanlon's ironic and stylish essay on flag decals and a joint-authored piece by Australians Mick Broderick and Mark Gibson. Scanlon's “Your flag decal won't get you into heaven anymore,” uses the massive uptake of the United States flag—actual flags and flag decals, slogans, and signs—to critique the cringe-worthy relationship between Wal-Mart, patriotism, and impoverishments of both symbolic and real capital. She shows how patriotism is performed through the purchase of goods, how retail stores laid claim to being patriotic sites, and how neatly...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,778
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,504

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,314
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in CanadaMême sujetMedia Studies and CommunicationTravaux en français237 207