MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1977278105 · doi:10.4314/sajrs.v26i1.25881

A case for physical education / life orientation : the health of a nation : research article

2004· article· en· W1977278105 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karel J Van Deventer

Notice bibliographique

RevueSouth African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and Recreation · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePhysical Education and Pedagogy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPhysical educationMedalPolitical scienceSummitPleaEconomic growthMedicineMedical educationGeographyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Worldwide Audit on the state and status of Physical Education (PE) in 1999 provides a clear picture of the threat under which the school subject seems to be on a worldwide scale. In the aftermath of the World Summit on PE, held in Berlin in 1999, it was deemed necessary to investigate the health status of populations and the current international and national trends regarding quality PE as a school subject. The research was conducted by means of a literature study in the field of health, education and PE. In the United States (US) the 1996 Surgeon General's report on physical activity and health as well as the 1997 subsequent recommendations from the Centres of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) clearly made a plea for quality daily PE in school programmes to promote physically active and healthy lifestyles among the youth. However, childhood obesity is currently plaguing the US and although the US seems to be the world leader in obesity among the youth, Europe, Australia and Canada do not seem to lag behind. South Africa (SA) is also following the world trend with our youth becoming increasingly inactive and obese. A number of initiates were launched in various countries to provide quality PE programmes in schools, but in SA only sport is regarded as an important component for the overall development and upliftment of previously disadvantaged communities. To ensure favourable medal counts at elite sports competitions the limited funds available have to be allocated, bearing these national priorities in mind. Against this backdrop the sports delivery network finds it economically and politically 'profitable' to promote elite sport at the expense of PE and 'sport for all' community projects (Burnett & Hollander, 1999). Attempts were made to reinstate PE as a school subject with full status, but in the Revised National Curriculum Statement (Grades R-9) of 2002 it is one focus (physical development and movement) among four other foci in the Life Orientation (LO) learning area. The National Curriculum Statement for Grades 10-12 is still in draft form but it seems that PE will also be a focus (recreation and physical well-being) of LO. Taking the initiatives and health status of children worldwide into account, Hardman (2002) and Chernushenko (2003) wonder whether reports on quality PE programmes in schools and communities are not just lip service. The key word to serve the mutual best interests of physical and health education as well as sport, is partnerships. The challenge for PE is to embrace initiatives at school, local community, national and international levels. These stakeholders need to stipulate detailed strategies to obtain short- and long-term objectives regarding health habits and physical activity patterns for the youth. Keywords: Health, Education, Physical education, Life orientation, Partnership South African Journal for Research in Sport, Physical Education and Recreation Vol.26(1) 2004: 107-121

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,173
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,334
Tête enseignante GPT0,616
Écart entre enseignants0,283 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueSouth African Journal for Research in Sport Physical Education and RecreationMême sujetPhysical Education and PedagogyTravaux en français237 207