MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1977801019 · doi:10.1353/can.0.0176

The Far Reaches of Empire: War in Nova Scotia, 1710–1760 (review)

2009· article· en· W1977801019 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Julian Gwyn

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNova scotiaSiegeEmpireHistoryColonialismAncient historyQuarter (Canadian coin)Nova (rocket)Economic historyClassicsArchaeologyEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Far Reaches of Empire: War in Nova Scotia, 1710–1760 Julian Gwyn The Far Reaches of Empire: War in Nova Scotia, 1710–1760. John Grenier. Norman: Oklahoma University Press, 2008. Pp. 288, US$34.95 Rare is the us historian of the colonial era whose interests extend beyond the Holy Thirteen. It is not only Florida that suffers from such neglect, for Quebec, Newfoundland, and Nova Scotia share the same fate. For Nova Scotia it is as if American scholars remain unaware of land and people across the Gulf of Maine. We thus welcome the publication on warfare in eighteenth-century Nova Scotia, as we have earlier from such American scholars as Faragher (2005) and Plank (2001) on the Acadiens, Mancke (2004) on Liverpool to 1830, and McNeill (1985) on Louisbourg. Dr Grenier has written a very strange book. He passes over the 1710 siege of Port Royal and the 1745 and 1758 sieges of Louisbourg with no more than a mere mention. As well, naval warfare in Nova Scotia waters is scarcely noticed and, like the sieges, few if any details or analyses are provided. Written for American audiences, his book will oblige them to look elsewhere for a balanced picture of war in Nova Scotia from 1710 to 1760. Where then is his focus? It is on the impact on both Acadiens and the Mi’kmaq of British and New England ambitions in Nova Scotia and Cape Breton. The centrality of the First Nations in his account explains why the book was published by the University of Oklahoma Press, which has produced an impressive array of publications on Native Americans. His approach leads him, for instance, to entitle his last substantive chapter ‘The Guerrilla War, 1755–1760.’ For historians of the great powers during the Seven Years’ War in North America, when the clash of arms was profound in Nova Scotia, this is astonishing. Instead of requiring him to provide something he ignores, we would have advised him to select a title for his book much more reflective of its contents, which are otherwise cleverly composed. An earlier chapter he calls ‘Father Le Loutre’s War, 1749–1755,’ which pitted a French priest’s efforts to protect both Acadiens and Mi’kmaq in the face of New Englanders’ ambitions, in the form of [End Page 331] Gorham’s Rangers, to destroy both. This focus leads Grenier to downplay the importance of the massive British invasion of Mi’kma’ki when Governor Cornwallis, with the support of three foot regiments, established in 1749 the town of Halifax as the new colonial capital, and began quickly to settle thousands of English and German families. Instead, in his account, Le Loutre’s return to Acadie in 1749 started the war, when his principal purpose was to convince Acadiens to relocate across the Missiguash River, on territory claimed by France. This chapter establishes the context for the British expulsion of the bulk of the Acadien population begun in 1755, and the effective destruction of Mi’kmaw hopes of retaining their ancient way of life. Why he was prepared to provide the background details to these events, which already have been very thoroughly studied, is unclear, when, as he writes elsewhere, the ‘story of New England’s siege of Louisbourg in the spring and summer of 1745 has been told many times and does not need recounting here’ (125). Though we might welcome yet another account of the numerous clashes between the rangers and the Mi’kmaq, his study results in a curiously unbalanced account of Nova Scotia’s warfare history to 1760. A redeeming feature is his skill in linking, where appropriate, ranger warfare against the Mi’kmaq with New England’s contemporaneous clashes with First Nations on its northern and eastern frontiers. Some note must be made of sources on which he has depended. He has made use of very few original manuscripts held in a variety of archives. Instead he relied overwhelmingly on published editions of documents. For instance, for the period before 1745 he makes considerable use of The Calendar of State Papers, Colonial Series. By doing so he preferred to use a précis of...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,588
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,819

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,243 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical ReviewMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207