Transatlantic Environment and Energy Politics: Comparative and International Perspectives – Edited by Miranda A. Schreurs, Henrik Selin, and Stacy D. VanDeveer
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Transatlantic Environment and Energy Politics: Comparative and International Perspectives . Farnum, UK : Ashgate Publishing Ltd . xvi + 326 pages. ISBN 978-0-7546-7597-6 , £60.00 cloth. Edited by Miranda A. Schreurs, Henrik Selin, and Stacy D. VanDeveer . 2009 . With the end of the Cold War and the emergence of the European Union (EU) as a single market and ever more powerful governance system in the 1990s, new strains began to develop in the Atlantic Alliance between the United States and Europe. Many of the new conflicts concerned competitive trade and regulatory policies in the scramble for globalization, but others revolved around previously cooperative sectors such as environmental and energy policies. Transatlantic differences in these areas peaked during the George W. Bush administration but in many cases were rooted in more fundamental cultural, political, economic, and institutional factors that divide the world's two largest markets. This volume contributes significantly to the growing literature on both transatlantic relations and comparative environmental policy. Schreurs, Selin, and VanDeveer, themselves leading scholars of international environmental politics, have brought together an impressive group of North American and European academics and practitioners to examine several major questions in their field of expertise: To what extent do policies of the United States and the EU diverge or conflict? What are the sources of these differences? Are they increasing over time, or are there countertendencies toward mutual learning and convergence? How have these divergences impacted the transatlantic alliance? What are the broader implications of U.S.–EU conflicts for global environmental governance and problem solving? These are critically important issues for academics, public officials, nongovernmental organizations, and all members of the broader environmental policy community. As the editors and authors of this book point out, the conventional wisdom of role reversal in which the United States led Europe in environmental policy development through the 1980s but has become a “laggard” since 1990 as Europe has adopted far more stringent policies is somewhat too simple. While it is true that the EU has moved ahead in many areas in which precaution and sustainability are guiding principles, it is not universally true. In several areas (such as forestry certification, disease prevention, and export credit guarantees), the United States has adopted more protective policies than Europe. Furthermore, there is considerable variation in the positions of individual European countries and between the federal government and the states in the United States. Indeed, the policies of many American states are now similar to those of the EU. Nevertheless, in most of the fields covered in this volume, the EU has established substantially more precautionary policies at the federal level than has the United States and is proving successful in “uploading” many of them to become new global standards. Following an introduction by the editors, the book is divided into four sections. Part I on “Governing Within and Beyond the State” contains more general essays by Elizabeth Bomberg and Sonja Wälti on policies for sustainable development and on intergovernmental management of environmental policies, respectively. These chapters set out useful theoretical approaches for understanding how different actors establish access and influence policy on the two sides of the Atlantic through the lenses of network analysis and institutionalized opportunity structures. Part II contains five case studies of policy differences in the areas of chemicals management (Henrik Selin); banning asbestos (Marcus Carson); electronic product waste and recycling (Alastair Iles); genetically modified foods (Patricia Keilbach); and international biotech controls under the Cartagena Protocol and other international bodies (Thomas Bernauer and Philipp Aerni). In each of these areas, the EU has moved considerably beyond the United States (e.g., the EU bans all uses of asbestos and the United States and Canada do not), and in many cases European standards are increasingly taking on the role of global standards as producers in other countries (including developing countries) cannot afford to risk exclusion of their products from European markets. Part III on “Governing Carbon” contains superb chapters on renewable electricity requirements (Ian Rowlands) and on climate change policies (Schreurs, Selin, and VanDeveer). These chapters bring out the increasing richness and complexity of transatlantic relations by stressing the growing role of subnational actors in compensating for the absence of energy and climate policies at the federal level in the United States. Finally, Part IV changes the focus to international market and trade policies. Marcus Schaper compares the progressive stance of U.S. export credit agencies compared with those in Europe, especially Germany; Benjamin Cashore, Graeme Auld, Deanna Newsom, and Elizabeth Eagan extend the comparison to nonstate governance by private actors in establishing international standards for sustainable forest product certification; and Kate O'Neill adds a useful perspective on transatlantic learning and convergence in her analysis of public health management of mad cow disease and avian flu. The level of scholarship is high throughout the book. However, as is common in edited collections, the contributors do not adhere to a single methodology or set of concepts in carrying out their analyses. Some authors make much more of an effort to explain causation than others (Iles does perhaps the best job in his chapter on product regulation). Nevertheless, they find a great deal of common ground. For example, all seem to agree that the rapid development of environmental competence in the institutions of the EU during the past two decades has been a major factor in thrusting European policies ahead. At the same time, since the 1980s, U.S. policies have been driven by conservative, antiregulatory forces that have blocked advances in Congress and in some cases weakened earlier policies. Overall, institutional differences turn out to matter a great deal. This book was completed before election of the Obama administration, which has repudiated many of the policies of the Bush administration and has vowed to make energy and environmental cooperation a centerpiece in rebuilding the transatlantic alliance. It will be interesting to see whether this major shift in American politics will reverse many of the trends discussed in this book, or whether more intractable underlying factors will continue to generate conflict. A follow-up volume should be in the works to supplement this useful study.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».