MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1977937926 · doi:10.1353/pah.2006.0016

Baldwin Papers: A Conservative Statesman, 1908-1947 (review)

2006· article· en· W1977937926 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stuart Ball

Notice bibliographique

RevueParliamentary History · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueScottish History and National Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOpposition (politics)PraisePrime ministerDemocracyGeorge (robot)LawAbdicationPoliticsEconomic historyPolitical scienceHistoryClassicsArt historyArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Baldwin Papers. A Conservative Statesman, 1908-1947 Stuart Ball Baldwin Papers. A Conservative Statesman, 1908-1947. Edited by Philip Williamson and Edward Baldwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004. xx, 526 pp. £75.00. ISBN 0521580803. Stanley Baldwin was the most successful and significant figure in British public life between the two world wars. He came to prominence in the fall of the Lloyd George coalition in October 1922, and in May 1923 succeeded Bonar Law as prime minister and leader of the Conservative party. He retained the latter post until he retired at a time of his own choosing, handing over a firmly-established National Government to Neville Chamberlain in May 1937. During these 14 years he fought five general elections, winning three of them. His periods in opposition were troubled but brief: the nine months of the first Labour government in 1924, and the 25 months of the second in 1929-31. He served three terms as prime minister (May 1923 to January 1924, November 1924 to June 1929 and June 1935 to May 1937), and his loyal service under Ramsay MacDonald as the second figure in the National Government from August 1931 to June 1935 was integral to its formation, survival and success. [End Page 292] In the 1920s, concerned to moderate the rise of Labour and encourage the new democratic electorate into constitutional paths, he won praise for his handing of the General Strike of 1926; in 1936 his conduct of the abdication crisis ensured that he retired at a pinnacle of public approval. However, in the following years his reputation fell to the lowest depths, as after 1940 he bore much of the blame for the failure of appeasement and the military deficiencies which contributed to the defeats at the start of the Second World War. Whilst Baldwin's importance is unarguable, his character, ability, achievements and failings have been the subject of debate ever since the appearance of the controversial and hostile official biography by G. M. Young in 1952.1 One reason for this is that Baldwin has always been a difficult figure to pin down. He spent most of his career in non-departmental posts; he was interested in the broad picture rather than detailed policy, and concerned with the general atmosphere of public life rather than partisan manoeuvre — areas that are as insubstantial as they are important. Baldwin left little trail in the sources that have been most valued by historians of British politics — the government archives and the collections of private papers. He wrote no memoirs, kept no diary, and his correspondence was characterized by its brevity and informality (whilst the Baldwin papers at Cambridge University Library have long been a major source, they consist almost entirely of the items that he received). His biographers have struggled with this lack, and have had to depend upon the comments of others — with the inevitable problems of bias, whether critical or uncritical. As Philip Williamson has earlier shown in the most revealing study of Baldwin to have been published thus far,2 the greatest understanding can be attained through examining the form of which Baldwin was the acknowledged master — his oratory. The speeches that he made, in parliament and to public meetings (often to nonpolitical audiences), were where he set out his ideas and purpose, and were the means by which he sought to move his countrymen and shape the atmosphere of politics and the morality of popular opinion. This present volume does not run counter to that fact, but rather adds a counterpoint to it by showing how Baldwin's public persona was founded in his private interactions. In this collection, Philip Williamson and Baldwin's grandson Edward explore the least-known Baldwin of them all — the letter-writer. They have searched a vast range of archives, including those of minor politicians and a number of religious and literary figures. This has not been limited to British sources, and of particular interest are the accounts of meetings with Baldwin by some of the dominion prime ministers, especially Mackenzie King of Canada. The latter are part of the other strand in the volume: Baldwin the conversationalist. As the introduction observes, most...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,213
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0400,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,204
Écart entre enseignants0,179 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueParliamentary HistoryMême sujetScottish History and National IdentityTravaux en français237 207