The IPIECA Marine Geospatial Bibliography
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Research on marine ecosystems is progressing rapidly, but information is often from disparate sources and in different formats. Although nominally publically available, it is frequently difficult to find, presenting a challenge in ensuring relevant information can be accessed freely and easily by all interested audiences. IPIECA, the global oil and gas industry association for environmental and social issues, have developed and launched an innovative knowledge sharing platform called the Marine Geospatial Bibliography (MGB). The business case for the development of the MGB is to centralise relevant environmental understanding relating to oil and gas activities in marine areas, ensuring it is transparent and can serve as the basis for policy and regulations, by making it publicly accessible whilst reducing duplication of effort. The MGB’s mission statement is to ‘‘identify and share sources of up-to-date scientific knowledge for management of oil and gas activities related to the marine environment, biodiversity, and ecosystems, whilst promoting ocean stewardship through increased transparency and greater awareness". The tool centralises and geospatially references reliable information, making it easy to find, search and summarise. The advantages of the MGB include that it: –Supports science-based environmental management enabling licence to operate;–Provides technical/scientific credibility and weight-of-evidence for regulatory decisions;–Allows horizontal transfer of knowledge between different communities of users;–Helps retain critical technical knowledge in the industry beyond the retirement boom The MGB’s primary audience is the oil and gas industry, however it is also intended to be of use to other audiences. The oil and gas industry often work with consultants who carry out baseline assessments or Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) so the information in the MGB could be relevant and useful for them. Additionally, it may be of interest to academics and scientists that perform research on deep water and marine environments. The MGB will also be of use to regulators and policy makers that make decisions based upon best available information to regulate the oil and gas industry. Finally the information contained in the MGB may be of interest to the public. At launch the MGB contained over 10,000 resources (including key papers, academic references and relevant industry grey literature) with an initial focus on the North Sea and Gulf of Mexico. This paper will explain the background/rationale for the project, the functionality and applicability of the MGB, and provide additional insight into the resources available. The paper will illustrate how IPIECA members are contributing information to the tool in the interests of greater transparency, and will outline future plans for expansion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle