Designing a novel continuing education program for pharmacists: Lessons learned
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rapid changes in health care and the evolving role of the pharmacist, as shown by the recent expanding scope of practice changes in several Canadian jurisdictions, have created a need for additional pharmacist continuing education (CE). Many pharmacists move into these new roles with excitement and trepidation. Some pharmacists may be comfortable communicating with patients but less certain how to document the care provided or how to conduct physical assessments. Some may have had plenty of opportunities to talk with physicians but less experience working with other health care providers. Many know that these new roles will improve patient care and want support and CE to move confidently into this new world. KEY POINTS Pharmacists want support and continuing education (CE) opportunities to move confidently into new roles. Partnership between primary health care pharmacists, professional associations and universities creates high-quality CE programming. Distance education best practices should inform course design and operation. A multi-faceted evaluation framework and soliciting learner feedback contributes to making an already good course even better. POINTS CLES Les pharmaciens veulent du soutien et des programmes de formation continue pour se preparer avec confiance a leurs nouveau roles. Le partenariat entre les pharmaciens prestataires de soins de sante primaires, les associations professionnelles et les universites favorise la creation de programmes de formation continue de haute qualite. La conception et la prestation des cours devraient s'appuyer sur des pratiques exemplaires en matiere d'education a distance. Un cadre d'evaluation a volets multiples et la collecte de la retroaction des apprenants contribuent a l'amelioration d'un cours qui est deja bon. A group of pharmacists involved in the Primary Care Pharmacy Specialty Network (PC-PSN), a joint initiative of the Canadian Pharmacists Association (CPhA) and the Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists (CSHP), could see that these changes were beginning to happen within the practices of PC-PSN members and through research initiatives such as IMPACT,1–3 SCRIP, SCRIP-plus and REACT.4–6 The group envisioned a “real-world,” accessible, national CE program that would enable pharmacists to enhance patient care in primary health care settings. This article describes the creation, pilot testing and launch of the Adapting Pharmacists' Skills and Approaches to Maximize Patients' Drug Therapy Effectiveness (ADAPT) CE program. The program comprises 7 online learning modules designed to enhance patient care and collaborative skills, plus a face-to-face workshop designed to provide additional feedback about those skills. Program development began in November 2009. The pilot offering of the program occurred from August 2010 to February 2011 and the program became available to all Canadian pharmacists in August 2011 (www.pharmacists.ca/adapt). It was a challenge to create a rigorous, high-quality program for working pharmacists that was practical in terms of the skills taught and the delivery method. A summary of the ADAPT development and implementation process is provided in Box 1. Lessons learned from the ADAPT experience may help others to develop similar CE programs in the future. Creating the training program framework In 2007, a PC-PSN training subcommittee created a Primary Health Care Skills Training Program framework (Box 2) using content and structure developed for the IMPACT (Integrating Family Medicine and Pharmacy to Advance Primary Care Therapeutics) project.7 Obtaining funding: Creating your luck The initial challenge was obtaining funding to create a high-quality CE program. A development grant provided by the McMaster University Department of Family Medicine supported the proposal development and networking with potential funders. Several meetings were held with representatives from faculties of pharmacy and pharmaceutical companies before the Health Canada opportunity, facilitated by CPhA, presented itself. In July 2009, CPhA worked with the PC-PSN on a $500,000 funding proposal to Health Canada's Health Care Policy Contribution Program to create a CE program for primary health care pharmacists using the arguments outlined in Table 1. CPhA, CSHP and PC-PSN representatives entered into a partnership for the purpose of this proposal. Notice of successful funding was received in November 2009. TABLE 1 Arguments for funding ADAPT program development and evaluation Lesson learned: Ensure adequate unrestricted funding. Health Canada's funding made it possible to assemble the right pharmacists, educators, researchers and project managers to deliver and evaluate a mixed model of online, real-world and in-person CE that is not biased toward a particular product, manufacturer or practice setting.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,019 | 0,040 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».