A proposal for the naming of N-glycosylation pathway components in Archaea
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor, In 1976, the long-held opinion that N-glycosylation was a trait restricted to eukaryotes was overturned when the surface-layer glycoprotein from the archaeon Halobacterium salinarum was shown to undergo such post-translational modification (Mescher and Strominger, 1976). Largely based on genomic studies, it is now believed that N-glycosylation is a common process in Archaea (Kaminski et al., 2013). Analysis of the limited number of characterized archaeal N-linked glycan reveals diversity in composition unparalleled in either eukaryal or bacterial N-glycosylation (Schwarz and Aebi, 2011; Eichler, 2013). Such variety is indicative of N-glycosylation in Archaea being largely mediated by different, species-specific pathways. Current biochemical descriptions of archaeal N-glycosylation systems support this claim (Jarrell et al., 2010; Eichler, 2013; Meyer and Albers, 2013). As such, it is essential that workers in the field adhere to a common nomenclature for the genes and proteins involved in the archaeal version of this post-translational modification. Indeed, by adopting an agreed upon naming system, some of the ambiguity plaguing the field of bacterial protein glycosylation might be avoided. For instance, although PglB, PglC, PglD, PglE and PglF all contribute to N-glycosylation in Campylobacter jejuni and O-glycosylation in Neisseria gonorrhoeae, proteins bearing the same name serve very different roles in each system (Linton et al., 2005; Aas et al., 2007). In 2006, Chaban et al. proposed the use of the abbreviation agl (for archaeal glycosylation) to identify genes involved in the archaeal version of N-glycosylation, along the guidelines for naming bacterial genes outlined in Demerec et al. (1966). Studies in Haloferax volcanii, Methanococcus voltae and Methanococcus maripaludis thus annotated proteins serving various N-glycosylation-related roles as AglA to AglZ (for review, see Eichler, 2013). More recently, however, additional genes encoding proteins implicated in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius N-glycosylation were annotated and published as agl1-agl4 and agl16 (Meyer et al., 2011, 2013). In this case, the nomenclature adopted is similar to that used for naming yeast genes, where a three letter abbreviation is followed by a number (Cherry et al., 2012). In the absence of an accepted set of rules for naming archaeal genes, we believe that the community would be best served by maintaining use of the agl/Agl abbreviation followed by a number for naming new archaeal N-glycosylation genes/proteins, given that all of the letters of the alphabet have already been used in this context. Indeed, given that archaeal N-glycosylation presents aspects of the both its bacterial and eukaryal counterparts (see Calo et al., 2010; Jarrell et al., 2010; Meyer and Albers, 2011), adopting a combination of bacterial and eukaryal nomenclature rules for naming genes involved in the archaeal version of this post-translational modification is fitting. By adopting an open-ended number-based system for naming novel archaeal N-glycosylation to be identified in the future, the enormous variety of genes/proteins responsible for the diversity seen in archaeal N-glycosylation could be nonetheless linked via the common agl abbreviation. At the same time, a shared N-glycosylation-related function would be assigned the same name in all species, as in the case of aglB, encoding the archaeal oligosaccharyltransferase. By the same logic, as the precise roles of Agl proteins become clear, components could be renamed with the first letter/number assigned that specific role. While such a naming strategy could result in a given archaeal species containing agl genes bearing widely spaced letters and/or numbers, it would allow for easy identification of similarities in N-glycosylation pathways that will likely prove to be otherwise largely species-specific. As members of the archaeal N-glycosylation research community, we propose that the agl-based nomenclature outlined above be adopted for annotating any relevant new genes and proteins identified. To facilitate such efforts, researchers are invited to visit the aglgenes website (www.bgu.ac.il/aglgenes), where an updated listing of agl sequences is provided.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».